Research Handbook on Transnational Labour Law 2015
DOI: 10.4337/9781782549796.00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion and leveraging of transnational labour norms by the OECD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article takes up this task with reference to the interaction between campaigns run by the Global Union Federations (GUFs) – the international umbrella organizations representing national unions in particular sectors – and their use of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to challenge labour abuses within global supply chains. Within the realm of responsible business practices, the OECD serves primarily as a mechanism for norm diffusion, rather than as a ‘major actor in international labour law’ (Thouvenin, 2015: 385, 389). At the same time, however, it provides one of the oldest ‘soft law’ mechanisms available to civil society organizations with a global reach (Ford et al, 2020; Ruggie and Nelson, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article takes up this task with reference to the interaction between campaigns run by the Global Union Federations (GUFs) – the international umbrella organizations representing national unions in particular sectors – and their use of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to challenge labour abuses within global supply chains. Within the realm of responsible business practices, the OECD serves primarily as a mechanism for norm diffusion, rather than as a ‘major actor in international labour law’ (Thouvenin, 2015: 385, 389). At the same time, however, it provides one of the oldest ‘soft law’ mechanisms available to civil society organizations with a global reach (Ford et al, 2020; Ruggie and Nelson, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%