2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion controlled analytical performances of hydrogen peroxide sensors: Towards the sensor with the largest dynamic range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 1b displays the corresponding calibration curve, where a linear trend between the H 2 O 2 concentration and the modified ultramicroelectrode response extends over almost three orders of magnitude, allowing the H 2 O 2 detection from 1 Á 10 À5 to 1 Á 10 À2 M. The sensitivity of the micro-sensors determined as the slope of the calibration graph is of 1.6 ± 0.5 A M À1 cm À2 , which is in good agreement with results obtained for Prussian Blue modified gold ultramicroelectrodes that were reported earlier [44,36]. The rather high detection limit at such a high sensitivity is due to the noise coming from the continuous stirring of the solution.…”
Section: Soft Stylus Probes As Hydrogen Peroxide Sensorssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Fig. 1b displays the corresponding calibration curve, where a linear trend between the H 2 O 2 concentration and the modified ultramicroelectrode response extends over almost three orders of magnitude, allowing the H 2 O 2 detection from 1 Á 10 À5 to 1 Á 10 À2 M. The sensitivity of the micro-sensors determined as the slope of the calibration graph is of 1.6 ± 0.5 A M À1 cm À2 , which is in good agreement with results obtained for Prussian Blue modified gold ultramicroelectrodes that were reported earlier [44,36]. The rather high detection limit at such a high sensitivity is due to the noise coming from the continuous stirring of the solution.…”
Section: Soft Stylus Probes As Hydrogen Peroxide Sensorssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Along with signal amplification, highly sensitive, stable and reliable electrode geometries are typically needed in order to measure low concentrations of the analyte of interest (Kim and Oh, 1996; Kim et al, 2007). Sensitivity of biosensor electrodes can be attained by the use of high-surface area electrodes made from nanomaterials including single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Kim et al, 2007; Rusling et al, 2009a,b; Yu et al 2006), nanoparticles, nanorods, or nanowires of noble metals (Hrapovic et al, 2004; Mani et al, 2009), and conductive polymers (Ekanayake et al, 2007; Karyakin et al, 2009). Transferring such nanostructured geometries from individual electrodes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having said this, working electrode modification with nanoparticles discussed above, is also expected to improve the limit of detection of implantable sensors. Keeping in mind the high cost involved in the design of nanoelectrodes, Karyakin et al (Karyakin et al 2009) have employed nanostructuring of the enzyme layer rather than the working electrodes and have achieved a two orders of magnitude lower detection limit (10 −9 nM of H 2 O 2 ) without a decrease of sensitivity compared to sensor with no enzyme nanostructuring. While optimization in such enzyme nanostructuring will further improve the limit of detection, a combinatorial approach involving enzyme nanostructuring on a nano-/micro-electrodes together with effective modifications in sensor architecture (McMahon et al 2005) is expected to further reduce the limit of detection.…”
Section: Advances In Electrochemical Biosensors Based On Nanotechnmentioning
confidence: 99%