1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(98)00147-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion effects at microhole supported liquid/liquid interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the standard experimental arrangement for studying the ion transfer at the interface of immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) based on a four electrode configuration [3][4][5][6][7], in recent years a few attempts have been made to utilize a three electrode arrangement to assess both the ion and the electron transfer processes across the L j L interface. Anson and co-workers [8][9][10][11][12][13] used a solid graphite electrode, the surface of which is completely covered with a thin film of an organic liquid containing an electroactive probe and immersed in an aqueous electrolyte (see Scheme 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the standard experimental arrangement for studying the ion transfer at the interface of immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) based on a four electrode configuration [3][4][5][6][7], in recent years a few attempts have been made to utilize a three electrode arrangement to assess both the ion and the electron transfer processes across the L j L interface. Anson and co-workers [8][9][10][11][12][13] used a solid graphite electrode, the surface of which is completely covered with a thin film of an organic liquid containing an electroactive probe and immersed in an aqueous electrolyte (see Scheme 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are often correlated with biological and pharmacological activity, such as adsorption, cell membrane permeability and hydrophobic binding. 4,5 Although large and significant progress has been achieved in the last decade, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] standard Gibbs energies of transfer of many common inorganic ions are still not available. 6 One reason for this situation are the limitations of the four-electrode technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, in some cases less reliable data have been reported in the literature, with values of DG falling close to the end of the potential window. Recent modifications in the four-electrode technique allowed an expansion of the potential window in ITIES experiments by measurements at microhole interfaces [7][8][9][10][11][12] or indirectly by coupling of chemical equilibria in both phases. 7,[17][18][19][20] However, the non-polarizability of some organic solvents (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transfer across the water|nitrobenzene interface has been studied in the following anions: octoate [201] dodecylsulfate [201,202]; picrate [98,[201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212][213][214][215] [250]. A huge number of cations have also been measured in the water|nitrobenzene interface: tetrabutylammonium (TBA + ) [15,19,210,212,213,217,230,[255][256][257][258][259][260]; tetraethylammonium (TEA + ) [19-21, 98, 202, 208-214, 218, 222, 254, 256, 259-266]; tetrapropylammonium (TPrA + ) [19,208,211,213,218,255,256,259,263]; tetramethylammonium (TMA + ) [20, 37, 84, 98, 202, 208-214, 218, 222, 230, 257, 259, 260, 262, 263, 266-269]; tetrapentylammonium (TPenA + ) [224,…”
Section: Water|nitrobenzene Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%