2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion effects on the determination of surface catalysis in Inductively Coupled Plasma facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, consistently with the first order reaction hypothesis, only surface temperature is normally considered to define the catalytic reaction rates. However, results previously obtained in this thesis, and in Ref [41,42,[107][108][109]. show that the recombination coefficient determination in plasma wind tunnels is influenced by both pressure and boundary layer chemical non-equilibrium conditions around a sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, consistently with the first order reaction hypothesis, only surface temperature is normally considered to define the catalytic reaction rates. However, results previously obtained in this thesis, and in Ref [41,42,[107][108][109]. show that the recombination coefficient determination in plasma wind tunnels is influenced by both pressure and boundary layer chemical non-equilibrium conditions around a sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…5.5 according to a reference flat plate model of 20 cm. This reference length is taken because it is representative of the flat plate model mentioned above, which has been extensively used in the VKI-Plasmatron [11,106,108,109,112].…”
Section: Scale Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the model has some drawbacks. Even though the γ parameter should depend only on the material properties (e.g., roughness) and its surface temperature [21], it has been observed experimentally that it depends explicitly on pressure [22] and the degree of chemical nonequilibrium in the boundary [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%