2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion experiments for estimating radiocesium and radiostrontium sorption in unsaturated soils from Spain: Comparison with batch sorption data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, taking into account that in the batch experiments carried in this work the actual amount of radioselenate was unknown, the batch d probably underestimated the actual radioselenite soil sorption capacity due to the presence of a significant concentration of non-sorbed radioselenate in the contact solution, and the resulting batch d could be taken as the weighted value for the sorption of the two radioselenium species in the soils. For that reason, in contrast with results obtained for other radionuclides in previous works [47], it is not possible to find a correlation between d values derived from diffusion experiments and those obtained from batch experiments. In addition, the radioselenite d values derived from diffusion data were within the range of values reported in the literature, also obtained by batch experiments.…”
Section: Radioselenium Sorptioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…However, taking into account that in the batch experiments carried in this work the actual amount of radioselenate was unknown, the batch d probably underestimated the actual radioselenite soil sorption capacity due to the presence of a significant concentration of non-sorbed radioselenate in the contact solution, and the resulting batch d could be taken as the weighted value for the sorption of the two radioselenium species in the soils. For that reason, in contrast with results obtained for other radionuclides in previous works [47], it is not possible to find a correlation between d values derived from diffusion experiments and those obtained from batch experiments. In addition, the radioselenite d values derived from diffusion data were within the range of values reported in the literature, also obtained by batch experiments.…”
Section: Radioselenium Sorptioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…For some reasons these K D discrepancies have often been attributed to the fact that the conditions of batch adsorption tests "have long been known to be unrepresentative of those existing in compacted clays", i.e., the surface properties and/or the adsorption site accessibility depend on the compaction (Shackelford and Moore 2013). This statement fi nds its origin in the batch and diffusion K D discrepancies observed primarily for Cs + in a range of published studies, with batch K D values typically higher than diffusion K D values (Miyahara et al 1991;Tsai et al 2001;Jakob et al 2009;Aldaba et al 2010). Studies of Cs + that compared adsorption in loose and compacted clay material, without relying on diffusion experiments, led to apparently contradictory results.…”
Section: K D Values Obtained From Static and Diffusion Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because retention is a very important aspect in a repository, several studies related to estimation of the Kd values for common isotopes present in radioactive wastes are found (EPA, 1999a,b;Sheppard, 2003;Wieland and Loon, 2003;EPA, 2004;Aldaba et al, 2010), although there are very few studies related to the impact of alkaline interaction on this parameter (Euratom, 2005). …”
Section: Impact Of Alkaline Alteration On Sorption Of Cesiummentioning
confidence: 99%