1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19990605)63:5<625::aid-bit13>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion in cell-free and cell immobilising ?-carrageenan gel beads with and without chemical reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4-15 the overall diffusion coefficient in the hydrogel is in the order of 85% of the one in free solution indicating a strong reduction in comparison with the free diffusion due to the hydrogel matrix. A similar reduction was observed by Mateus et al (1999) for κ-carrageenan hydrogel beads.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4-15 the overall diffusion coefficient in the hydrogel is in the order of 85% of the one in free solution indicating a strong reduction in comparison with the free diffusion due to the hydrogel matrix. A similar reduction was observed by Mateus et al (1999) for κ-carrageenan hydrogel beads.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Two strategies are compared in Figure 4-10 − concentration measurements in the bulk phase and in the bead center. The first strategy has already been applied by Mateus et al (1999) to κ-carrageenan hydrogel beads. Figure 4-10 shows that the normalized sensitivity of the diffusion coefficient of DMBA is more than three orders of magnitude higher in the bead center.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this table, it can be seen that high collagen concentrations alone significantly reduced diffusion (Ramanujan et al 2002;Kanamori et al 2000). In addition, the entrapment of bacterial or mammalian cells in gel obviously inhibits mass transfer by decreasing the diffusivity as a result of enhanced tortuosity (Mateus et al 1999;Nicholson and Phillips 1981;Nicholson and Sykova 1998). As the embedded viable cells mentioned above possibly exacerbate the reduced diffusivity, our previous entrapment of dead cells without causing contraction could better reflect the contribution of cells alone to the reduced diffusivity (Wu et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, as observed by many investigators, the diffusional resistance of the cells to substrates and products is usually higher than the resistance in the support matrixes (Westrin and Axelsson, 1991). In this case, the effectiveness factor of the immobilized cell biocatalysts monotonically decreases with the increase of the cell concentration (Mateus et al, 1999;Sakaki et al, 1988). This competition between intrinsic reaction rate and diffusional resistance raises the question to be addressed here as to the most advantageous amount of cells to be incorporated into the support matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are two diffusion models that reflect a cellular diffusion component (Mateus et al, 1999). A general diffusion model for the prediction of the D e was first proposed for a mammalian tumor cell-agar gel system (Chresand et al, 1988) based on the Maxwell's model for effective conductivities (Maxwell, 1973) as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%