Purpose: pH-weighted amide proton transfer (APT) MRI is promising to serve as a new surrogate metabolic imaging biomarker for refined ischemic tissue demarcation.APT MRI with pulse-RF irradiation (pulse-APT) is an alternative to the routine continuous wave (CW-) APT MRI that overcomes the RF duty cycle limit. Our study aimed to generalize the recently developed pH-specific magnetization transfer and relaxationnormalized APT (MRAPT) analysis to pulse-APT MRI in acute stroke imaging. Methods: Multiparametric MRI, including CW-and pulse-APT MRI scans, were performed following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. We calculated pH-sensitive MTR asym and pH-specific MRAPT contrast between the ipsilateral diffusion lesion and contralateral normal area. Results: An inversion pulse of 10 to 15 ms maximizes the pH-sensitive MRI contrast for pulse-APT MRI. The contrast-to-noise ratio of pH-specific MRAPT effect between the contralateral normal area and ischemic lesion from both methods are comparable (3.25 ± 0.65 vs. 3.59 ± 0.40, P > .05). pH determined from both methods were in good agreement, with their difference within 0.1. Conclusions: Pulse-APT MRI provides highly pH-specific mapping for acute stroke imaging.
K E Y W O R D Sacidosis, acute stroke, amide proton transfer (APT), chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), pulse-CEST MRI | 1527 SUN mismatch into perfusion/pH lesion mismatch (benign oligemia) and pH/diffusion lesion mismatch (metabolic penumbra), refining the routine mismatch paradigm. 13,14 Indeed, recent clinical trials have shown that response to endovascular reperfusion is not time dependent in patients with salvageable tissue, underscoring the importance of accurate penumbra mapping. [15][16][17] Although CEST MRI has often been implemented with continuous wave (CW) RF irradiation, the irradiation scheme of an RF pulse train is of reduced RF duty cycle and specific absorption rate (SAR), making it amenable to all scanners. 18 For slow exchangeable protons, it has been shown that pulse-CEST MRI with inversion pulses of intermediate durations provides similar contrast to that of CW-CEST MRI. [19][20][21] The routine magnetization transfer (MT) ratio asymmetry (MTR asym ) analysis, despite its pH sensitivity, is susceptible to the slightly asymmetric magnetization transfer (MT) effects. MTR asym is heterogeneous across the intact white and gray matter despite their little pH difference. 22 It has been shown that in rats, the T 1w -normalized CEST effects for the intact brain WM and GM are 2.08 ± 0.20 vs. 2.00 ± 0.23%/s (APT), −1.79 ± 0.88 vs. −0.89 ± 0.97%/s (MT contrast asymmetry) and 4.42 ± 0.58 vs. 3.38 ± 0.42%/s (nuclear overhauser enhancement, NOE), respectively. 23 Indeed, the noticeable NOE and MT contrast between brain WM and GM despite their little pH difference suggest that NOE and MT effects are not pH specific. The recently developed MT and relaxation-normalized APT (MRAPT) analysis minimizes the intrinsic non-pH related heterogeneity in pH-weighted MTR asym image toward pH-specific im...