Diffusion of a Social Norm: Tracing the Emergence of the Housewife in the Netherlands, 1812-1922

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may SummaryThe emergence of the housewife in the Netherlands over the period 1812-1922 was strongly influenced by the social norm that women should withdraw from the labour market on the eve of marriage. Adherence to this norm is most clearly reflected in the emergence of the housewife among the lower classes, especially at the close of the nineteenth century among wives of farmers. Women in urban municipalities, however, set the norm far earlier and differences across social classes were significantly larger in towns than in rural areas. Paradoxically, the rise of the housewife did not change work pressures for lower-class women. This paradox is resolved by noting that they substituted registered work for unregistered work, e.g., in house industries, working in the family firm or farm.( The present study tries to make the tacit element in choices -the preference switch to which De Vries refers -more explicit and focuses on the emergence of the housewife in the Netherlands in the period 1812-1922. We will do so with the aid of marriage certificates. The story that unfolds is that the choice of women to withdraw from the labour market upon marriage is the result of three forces: (1) the intrinsic value of household 'products' (health, domesticity, schooling of children); (2) the reputational costs and benefits linked to becoming a housewife; and (3) the effects of choice on one's self-conception, or as Kuran would call it 'expressive utility'. 7The intrinsic value of household production offers the core rationale for the social beliefs about how health and human wealth are created within the household and how labour should be divided. One reason given for women to stay at home was that it was the right thing to do for a mother. What makes our story so remarkable is that women withdrew from the labour market before children were born. This would suggest that the choice of entering marriage as a housewife was driven primarily by social norms.Social norms -the second factor -operate as taxes and subsidies of individual choice and appear in many guises, such as laws, rules of conduct, wage discrimination and subsidies, working conditions, dismissal of women who become pregnant or pregnancy leave without pay, stereotyping, etc. The list of instruments to penalise the efforts of married women to accept work is long and diverse.The third factor is closely related to the presence of norms. For example, a bride may choose to sta...

Trends and risk factors of maternal mortality in late-nineteenth-century Netherlands

“…This drop in female employment coincides with the emergence of the housewife norm whereby married women gradually ceased to work outside of the home over the course of the nineteenth century (F. Van Poppel, Van Dalen, & Walhout, 2009).…”

A Habitual Activity in Pre-industrial Rural and Urban Dutch Populations: A Study of Lower Limb Cross-sectional Geometry

“…This rural community was focused around cattle farming (Falger et al 2012), and osteoarchaeological research suggests a physically strenuous life for both men and women (Lemmers et al 2013;Palmer et al 2014;Saers 2012;Vikatou et al 2017, submitted manuscript). In nineteenth-century Netherlands a somewhat rigid sexual division of labor was the norm; in the Beemster region, men typically worked out-doors in the pastures and women typically worked in and around the house, milking cows, churning butter, making cheese, preparing meals, sewing and washing clothing, and tending to other household chores and children (Falger et al 2012;van Cruynin-gen 2005;van Nederveen Meerkerk 2015;van Poppel et al 2009). However, it was common for women to work in the pastures when necessary, with child care and household tasks leſt to older children and grand-mothers (Lindeboom et al 2012).…”

Gender Inequality, Endogenous Cultural Norms, and Economic Development

“…The association between the first stages of the industrialization process and the withdrawal of women from the labor force has also been noted by several papers in the economic history literature, such as Seccombe () and Horrell and Humphries () for Britain or van Poppel et al . () for The Netherlands. These authors emphasize that the initial fall in FLFP came with the emergence and diffusion of social norms according to which the male should be the main breadwinner of the family.…”