2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2010.030166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of organisational innovation: knowledge transfer through social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Membership in provider associations may connect programs to trade resources and industry-wide representatives, whereas linkages at the local level may not facilitate access to such information. Byosiere and colleagues (2010), drawing on the work of Polanyi (1966), further argue weak ties can facilitate the transfer of explicit forms of knowledge. In this way, national associations may have helped to facilitate the diffusion of buprenorphine, an example of explicit knowledge, to programs sooner than those reporting membership in provider associations only within their state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membership in provider associations may connect programs to trade resources and industry-wide representatives, whereas linkages at the local level may not facilitate access to such information. Byosiere and colleagues (2010), drawing on the work of Polanyi (1966), further argue weak ties can facilitate the transfer of explicit forms of knowledge. In this way, national associations may have helped to facilitate the diffusion of buprenorphine, an example of explicit knowledge, to programs sooner than those reporting membership in provider associations only within their state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of knowledge connectors can play an important role in making this information available to other employees, increasing the likelihood of transfer. Further, the transfer of knowledge in an organization is impacted by the strength of social relationships [27][28]. The strength of these relationships is particularly important when transferring tacit and complex information [27,29,30].…”
Section: Principle #2: Knowledge Is Particularly Vulnerable To Loss Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the transfer of knowledge in an organization is impacted by the strength of social relationships [27][28]. The strength of these relationships is particularly important when transferring tacit and complex information [27,29,30]. Given the importance of relationships on knowledge transfer, particularly complex, tacit knowledge, Cross et al [31] concludes that a broader group of "go-to" individuals should be developed in a firm to avoid the reliance on a few key individuals.…”
Section: Principle #2: Knowledge Is Particularly Vulnerable To Loss Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emphasis on intraorganisational processes and stimulating the key variables set by creative individuals, groups, organizations (Woodman, Sawyer, & Griffin, 1993) and the extraorganisational processes would go a long way in increasing the innovative pace in organizations. The social context and its interpretation are linked to innovation at many levels, either in the form of inter- (Byosiere, Luethege, Vas, & Paz Salmado, 2010;Vaccaro, Parente, & Veloso, 2010) or intra-organizational linkages (Ohly, Kaše, & Škerlavaj, 2010;Wallin & Von Krogh, 2010).…”
Section: Innovation As a Multi-level Process In The Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%