2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of Water through the Dual-Porosity Swelling Clay Mineral Vermiculite

Abstract: Prediction of water and solute migration in natural clay-based materials requires a detailed understanding of the roles played by different porosity types (around or inside clay particles) on the overall transfer process. For smectite, a reference material for the design of migration models, this discrimination is complex because of osmotic swelling of the structure under water-saturated conditions. Diffusion experiments with a water tracer (HDO) were conducted on 0.1-0.2, 1-2, and 10-20 μm size fractions of N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the pore size is very small, many studies have shown that the diffusion process dominates the transportation of radionuclides in bentonite buffer (Idiart & Pękala, 2016; Tournassat & Appelo, 2011; Van Loon et al, 2007). Radionuclides diffusion is influenced by many factors, such as dry densities of bentonite (Sato et al, 1992; Wu et al, 2018), salinities and compositions of pore solution (Glaus et al, 2020; Tachi & Yotsuji, 2014; Wigger & Van Loon, 2018), and sizes and shapes of clay particles (Tertre et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pore size is very small, many studies have shown that the diffusion process dominates the transportation of radionuclides in bentonite buffer (Idiart & Pękala, 2016; Tournassat & Appelo, 2011; Van Loon et al, 2007). Radionuclides diffusion is influenced by many factors, such as dry densities of bentonite (Sato et al, 1992; Wu et al, 2018), salinities and compositions of pore solution (Glaus et al, 2020; Tachi & Yotsuji, 2014; Wigger & Van Loon, 2018), and sizes and shapes of clay particles (Tertre et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study concerns only experimental NMR measurements performed for a single clay sample, we feel justified to compare the water mobility measured by 1 H PGSE-NMR within kaolinite clay and that evaluated by HDO through diffusion 17,21,31 and PGSE-NMR 37 within porous networks of various granular materials. While PGSE-NMR experiments directly quantify the intrinsic self-diffusion coefficient 33 D of the fluid confined within various porous networks, 12,16,24,37,39,40,54,55 through-diffusion measurements are sensitive to the fluid permeability of the macroscopic porous media, leading to an effective diffusion coefficient 17,21,31 D e . The corresponding intrinsic mobility of the fluid inside the porous network may be evaluated by the simple relationshipwhere, ϕ is the porosity of the porous network.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effective diffusion coefficient is directly linked to the pore diffusion parameter commonly derived from NMR measurements probing only the porosity accessible for the investigated probe. A large number of experiments were performed in literature to investigate the influence of porosity on the diffusion of water and ions in porous media made of clayey particles [69,[92][93][94]. Water diffusion coefficients obtained using Through-Diffusion experiments and PGSE-NMR analyses performed with compacted kaolinite samples, characterized by the same porosity and preferential particle orientation, revealed similar results (see Figure 23), despite the different time scale probed by the two methods (i.e., ms for PGSE-NMR versus several days for Through-Diffusion [52]).…”
Section: Macroscopic Diffusion Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%