2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-016-0639-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Deterministic Error Bounds

Abstract: Errors in the data and the forward operator of an inverse problem can be handily modelled using partial order in Banach lattices. We present some existing results of the theory of regularisation in this novel framework, where errors are represented as bounds by means of the appropriate partial order. We apply the theory to diffusion tensor imaging, where correct noise modelling is challenging: it involves the Rician distribution and the non-linear Stejskal-Tanner equation. Linearisation of the latter in the st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, with the data term ( 1.7 ) and without an operator error, ( 1.2 ) translates into where the constraint is equivalent to ‖ Au − f δ ‖ ∞ ⩽ δ . (In [ 25 ], a connection is made between the lower and upper bounds f l , f u and confidence intervals.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison, with the data term ( 1.7 ) and without an operator error, ( 1.2 ) translates into where the constraint is equivalent to ‖ Au − f δ ‖ ∞ ⩽ δ . (In [ 25 ], a connection is made between the lower and upper bounds f l , f u and confidence intervals.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the constraint is equivalent to Au − f δ ∞ δ. (In [25], a connection is made between the lower and upper bounds f l , f u and confidence intervals.) One can show that the partial order based condition (1.5) implies the norm based condition (1.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A drawback of the formulation (1.8), however, is that the data term (1.7) is rather noninformative and does not take into account statistical properties of the noise. In [24], a connection is made between the lower and upper bounds f l , f u in (1.8) and confidence intervals; however, this still does not capture full information about the statistics of the noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%