2015
DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1066014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Theory in the New Media Environment: Toward an Integrated Technology Adoption Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the media anthropology literature (McDonald, 2016;Miller, 2011;Postill, 2008) and development communication research (Tacchi, 2015;Tufte, 2012) have paid attention to the various collision points between local cultural and community norms with global values and processes as well as development interventions that aim for social or behavioral change. There are crucial distinctions to note: some strands of development communication work such as those on diffusion of innovations subscribe to top-down models of media power that are reductive of people's social identities and cultural contexts (e.g., Atkin, Hunt and Lin, 2015), while other "culture-centered approaches" such as in health communication end up overly essentializing culture by using it as a crutch to explain away social difference without returning to important questions of media power (e.g., Dutta, 2008). Arora and her colleague find problematic the normative premise behind some development communication research that reduces technologies as instruments aiming for public knowledge and political empowerment for needy "third world" subjects.…”
Section: From Objects To Subjects: Attending To the Lifeworlds Of Affmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the media anthropology literature (McDonald, 2016;Miller, 2011;Postill, 2008) and development communication research (Tacchi, 2015;Tufte, 2012) have paid attention to the various collision points between local cultural and community norms with global values and processes as well as development interventions that aim for social or behavioral change. There are crucial distinctions to note: some strands of development communication work such as those on diffusion of innovations subscribe to top-down models of media power that are reductive of people's social identities and cultural contexts (e.g., Atkin, Hunt and Lin, 2015), while other "culture-centered approaches" such as in health communication end up overly essentializing culture by using it as a crutch to explain away social difference without returning to important questions of media power (e.g., Dutta, 2008). Arora and her colleague find problematic the normative premise behind some development communication research that reduces technologies as instruments aiming for public knowledge and political empowerment for needy "third world" subjects.…”
Section: From Objects To Subjects: Attending To the Lifeworlds Of Affmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers (2003) considered diffusion a staged process, showing that innovators and early adopters were younger, more affluent, more knowledgeable, and socially connected than the general population. This paradigm, however, does not include micro-level factors (Atkin, Hunt, & Lin, 2015). Thus, several technology acceptance models were developed to incorporate individual factors (Davis, 1989;Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003).…”
Section: The Integrated Technology Adoption Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models are used to explain how users evaluate the benefits and gains of adoption and how they are contingent upon social influence. The most recent adoption studies follow the integrated technology adoption paradigm (ITAP) proposed by Atkin, Hunt, and Lin (2015) and Lin (2003). This paradigm incorporates macro systemic factors as well as micro-level variables.…”
Section: The Integrated Technology Adoption Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In essence, the competition offers a venue for increasing awareness, demonstrating relevance, building confidence, and proving satisfaction for faculty audiences. Furthermore, the influence of peers can play an important role in promoting change in the attitudes of faculty audiences 19,20,21,22 . The competition acting as a medium for triggering a contagion effect, or social spillover effect, can lead faculty audiences to imitate the adoption behaviors of their peer group of participants.…”
Section: Teaching Innovation With Technology Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%