2021
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion‐weighted and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI to assess radiation therapy response for head and neck paragangliomas

Abstract: Background and Purpose The prediction of radiotherapy outcome in head and neck paragangliomas is clinically important. We investigated perfusion and diffusion markers for evaluation of response to radiotherapy of head and neck paragangliomas. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 330 consecutive patients from January 2016 to September 2019 with suspected head and neck paragangliomas, and enrolled 11 patients (2 males, 9 females; age: 55.2 ± 10.3 years) who had conventional MRI and dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MR imaging can assess tumor microvasculature and permeability 8,9 and has been increasingly used to assess head and neck lesions. [10][11][12][13] However, DWI and DCE-MR imaging analysis for these tumors and for the mutation status of paragangliomas has not been fully explored. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that ADC values and DCE-MR imaging could help differentiate schwannomas from paragangliomas and distinguish nonhereditary and hereditary paragangliomas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MR imaging can assess tumor microvasculature and permeability 8,9 and has been increasingly used to assess head and neck lesions. [10][11][12][13] However, DWI and DCE-MR imaging analysis for these tumors and for the mutation status of paragangliomas has not been fully explored. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that ADC values and DCE-MR imaging could help differentiate schwannomas from paragangliomas and distinguish nonhereditary and hereditary paragangliomas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCE‐MRI can help to assess tumor microvasculature and permeability. This technique has been used for both characterization and differentiation of tumors and prediction of treatment effect in the head and neck 12,21–23 . ROIs were placed within the enhancing component of the tumors, avoiding the portions that mainly showed cystic/necrotic components, which could have lower the values of DCE‐MRI parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been used for both characterization and differentiation of tumors and prediction of treatment effect in the Receiver operating characteristic curves of (A) meningioma versus paraganglioma, (B) meningioma versus schwannoma, and (C) paraganglioma versus schwannoma. Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve head and neck 12,[21][22][23]. ROIs were placed within the enhancing component of the tumors, avoiding the portions that mainly showed cystic/ necrotic components, which could have lower the values of DCE-MRI parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) include Vp (fractional plasma volume), Ve (fractional volume of extracellular space), Kep (reverse reflux rate constant), and Ktrans (forward volume transfer constant), and can assess a tumor's microcirculation 10 . Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and DCE‐MRI have been recently used for differentiation of head and neck tumors and treatment effect assessment 11–14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and DCE-MRI have been recently used for differentiation of head and neck tumors and treatment effect assessment. [11][12][13][14] Therefore, in this study we aimed to assess the utility of DWI and DCE-MRI as well as conventional MRI findings for differentiation between sporadic and NF2 VSs and to compare the diagnostic performances between DWI and DCE-MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%