2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-019-0489-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging using a preclinical 1 T PET/MRI in healthy and tumor-bearing rats

Abstract: Background Hybrid positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) scanners are increasingly used for both clinical and preclinical imaging. Especially functional MRI sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are of great interest as they provide information on a molecular level, thus, can be used as surrogate biomarkers. Due to technical restrictions, MR sequences need to be adapted for each system to perform reliable imaging. There is, to our knowledge, no suitable … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we believe that this important parameter affects the accuracy of the measurement ( Boyko et al, 2019b ; Kuts et al, 2019a ) and therefore was used in our protocol. It should also be mentioned that this parameter is influenced by many factors, including the size of the brain ( Yushmanov et al, 2002 ; Purushotham et al, 2015 ), brain region ( Yuan et al, 2017 ), model of the disease under study ( Bardutzky et al, 2005 ; Albrecht et al, 2019 ) and age-related trends in the rat ( Bardutzky et al, 2005 ; Bontempi et al, 2021 ). We used the recommended optimal threshold parameters for correction of ADC maps ( Benveniste et al, 1992 ; Yushmanov et al, 2002 ; Meng et al, 2004 ; Bra et al, 2009 ), which have been tested in rat ischemia models ( Boyko et al, 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we believe that this important parameter affects the accuracy of the measurement ( Boyko et al, 2019b ; Kuts et al, 2019a ) and therefore was used in our protocol. It should also be mentioned that this parameter is influenced by many factors, including the size of the brain ( Yushmanov et al, 2002 ; Purushotham et al, 2015 ), brain region ( Yuan et al, 2017 ), model of the disease under study ( Bardutzky et al, 2005 ; Albrecht et al, 2019 ) and age-related trends in the rat ( Bardutzky et al, 2005 ; Bontempi et al, 2021 ). We used the recommended optimal threshold parameters for correction of ADC maps ( Benveniste et al, 1992 ; Yushmanov et al, 2002 ; Meng et al, 2004 ; Bra et al, 2009 ), which have been tested in rat ischemia models ( Boyko et al, 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viable tumor area was determined as previously described [40] , using PMOD software version 3.505 (PMOD Technologies, Zürich, Switzerland). Briefly, a whole tumor region of interest (ROI) was placed onto the T2w images and copied to fused PET/MRI images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolically active tumor tissue was determined by fused 18 F-FDG PET and T2-weighted MRI as previously described (15). Briefly, a tumor volume of interest was placed onto T2-weighted images.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%