2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26]. However, ADC values were reported in the aggregate for the two types of cholangiocarcinoma without subgroup analysis so that the specific ADC value of hilar cholangiocarcinomas was not reported [26]. In our study, the ADC value of cholangiocarcinomas was significantly lower than that of the apparently normal hepatic parenchyma, which is consistent with prior studies who uniformly reported that malignant hepatic tumors have lower ADC values than the normal hepatic parenchyma 14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[26]. However, ADC values were reported in the aggregate for the two types of cholangiocarcinoma without subgroup analysis so that the specific ADC value of hilar cholangiocarcinomas was not reported [26]. In our study, the ADC value of cholangiocarcinomas was significantly lower than that of the apparently normal hepatic parenchyma, which is consistent with prior studies who uniformly reported that malignant hepatic tumors have lower ADC values than the normal hepatic parenchyma 14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…* Conspicuity was semi-quantitatively assessed using a five point scale (1-5). [26]. However, ADC values were reported in the aggregate for the two types of cholangiocarcinoma without subgroup analysis so that the specific ADC value of hilar cholangiocarcinomas was not reported [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Few experiences, mainly focused to a qualitative visual assessment of DW images, have been reported regarding cholangiocarcinoma (CCC). Cui et al [41] found an inverse correlation between the pathological grade and ADC values; Park et al [42] reported that the addition of DWI to conventional sequences might improve the pre-operative assessment of hilar CCC, increasing the sensitivity for the evaluation of tumor extent along the bile ducts and liver invasion, thus improving T stage, a parameter that is directly related to prognosis.…”
Section: Primary Liver Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DW-MRI at high b values is a reliable predictor for a malignant bile stricture and can improve sensitivity of MRCP due to its sensitivity in appraising hypercellularity [5,11,[14][15][16]; nevertheless care must be taken since inflammatory processes can also be hyperintense on DW-MRI [15,16]. Moreover DW-MRI may not be discriminatory in cases of well differentiated neoplasms or for small tumors, and image quality may suffer from artifacts that induce signal loss [11].…”
Section: Mri Findings Odds Ratio (95% Ci) Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover DW-MRI may not be discriminatory in cases of well differentiated neoplasms or for small tumors, and image quality may suffer from artifacts that induce signal loss [11]. …”
Section: Mri Findings Odds Ratio (95% Ci) Pmentioning
confidence: 99%