2013
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2012.755542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusive Model with Variable Effective Diffusivity Considering Shrinkage for Hot-Air Drying of Lightly Salted Grass Carp Fillets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 and 4, respectively. As seen in many studies, the MR values versus the drying time exponentially decreased [6,[26][27][28]. While the decrease in MR values was very rapid at the beginning of the drying period, the rate decreased with the decreasing moisture of the dried fillets.…”
Section: Drying Kinetics Of Fish Filletsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 and 4, respectively. As seen in many studies, the MR values versus the drying time exponentially decreased [6,[26][27][28]. While the decrease in MR values was very rapid at the beginning of the drying period, the rate decreased with the decreasing moisture of the dried fillets.…”
Section: Drying Kinetics Of Fish Filletsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…), osmotic dehydration and mechanical dewatering [2]. There has been a lot of research done on drying fish using different methods, including sun drying [3], solar drying [4,5], hot air drying [6] and microwave-hot air drying [2]. These different drying methods each have their own distinct advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fishes were then further dried in the oven at 140 C for a week to find the absolute solid content (mass of dry solid) of the fish, which is a modified version of the method used by Jain and Pathare (2007) as fish samples continue to lose moisture until F I G U R E 1 Schematic diagram of the experimental setup 150 C during heating (Silva, Silva, Andrade, Veloso, & Santos, 2008). Moisture content, X (kg/kg dry solid) was determined from the standard formula, X = (m-m s )/m s (Luo et al, 2013) and drying rate (kg/hr) were calculated from the instantaneous weight variations of the fish samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the analysis was limited to few drying kinetic models and effective diffusivity determination only. Similarly, Luo, Xia, Xu, and Jiang (2013) and Pinto and Tobinaga (2006) have performed shrinkage dependent diffusivity modeling during convective drying of lightly salted grass carp fillets and fish muscle slabs, respectively. However, energy aspect of convective air-drying (energy consumption, specific evaporation rate, etc.)…”
Section: Several Traditional Intermediate and Advanced Drying Equipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It affects the porous shape and rehydration capability of a given Most of the studies related to food shrinkage focus on developing mathematical models with a macro-scale approach to predict shrinkage during drying [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . An interesting review of this subject can be found in Mayor and Sereno [22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%