2018
DOI: 10.1080/1828051x.2018.1443404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestibility and palatability of isolated porcine protein in dogs

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the digestibility and palatability of an isolated porcine protein (IPP) for adult dogs. In the digestibility assay, eight adult Beagle dogs were distributed in a double Latin square (4 Â 4) experimental design. Diets containing 0, 100, 200, or 300 g IPP/kg were offered. Diets (0-300 g IPP/kg) presented 229.6-265.3 g/kg crude protein (CP) and 17.59-18.73 MJ/kg metabolisable energy (ME). The apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of diets and of the IPP were evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein digestibility of offal meal was inferior to those described by Murakami et al (2018) of 84.84% and by Kawauchi et al (2014) of 67.5%. The lowest digestibility verified in the HFM, whose value was 27.72%.…”
Section: Journal Of Agricultural Studiescontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The protein digestibility of offal meal was inferior to those described by Murakami et al (2018) of 84.84% and by Kawauchi et al (2014) of 67.5%. The lowest digestibility verified in the HFM, whose value was 27.72%.…”
Section: Journal Of Agricultural Studiescontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…According to the criteria established by Murakami et al (2018), due to the small number of repetitions, in this case, RI results are considered significant only above 0.8 of A in relation to B.…”
Section: Dog Weight (Kg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the number of animals included in the test is an important consideration when interpreting the results. Although using 20 animals over 2 or 4 days is considered to increase the test resolution ( 36 ), the number of animals used in palatability tests greatly differs in the literature, with studies reporting the use of 8 ( 66 ), 10 ( 67 ), and 16 ( 68 ) animals. In the current study, despite the sample size (12 animals) being defined according to an earlier study that evaluated the dietary supplementation with shrimp hydrolysate ( 37 ), the number of animals used was lower than the generally recommended (20 animals), so some caution should be taken when interpreting the results obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%