1998
DOI: 10.3905/joi.1998.408445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

”Digestible” Asset Allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explain the variability in performance by strategic asset allocation, we performed a simple regression of the fund's performance against the benchmarks [15], calculated and analyzed coefficients of determination R-square. 8 The calculations were also redone taking into consideration three differentiating variables, namely: the category of the funds (stock, bond or balanced), the fund size [21], and the level of the tracking error [22,23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain the variability in performance by strategic asset allocation, we performed a simple regression of the fund's performance against the benchmarks [15], calculated and analyzed coefficients of determination R-square. 8 The calculations were also redone taking into consideration three differentiating variables, namely: the category of the funds (stock, bond or balanced), the fund size [21], and the level of the tracking error [22,23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their result revealed that the Markowitz optimization model is the worstperforming model and dynamic allocation model outperforms static allocation model. Jahnke (1997) pointed asset allocation should be viewed as a dynamic process. It should take into consideration both pension obligation and capital market opportunities, including risk, otherwise makes no economic sense.…”
Section: Investment Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, such artificial intelligence techniques as neural networks, decision trees, Genetic algorithms, and genetic programming all use historical data for learning and training to produce fixed forecasting models. Historical data don't constitute a good representation of the forthcoming period (Amenc and Le Sourd 2003) and historical returns are not only unreliable indicators of future returns but also perverse indicators (Jahnke 1997). Therefore, this type of forecasting model cannot perform very well when the real environment is completely different from the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, these findings have often been misinterpreted by academics and professional investors causing a controversy that stems from using the same results to answer the inappropriate questions 1 . In this sense, Jahnke (1997) argues that Brinson et al . (1986, 1991) analyse the wrong question, focusing on the return variability explained by asset allocation rather than on the level of return 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these findings have often been misinterpreted by academics and professional investors causing a controversy that stems from using the same results to answer the inappropriate questions. 1 In this sense, Jahnke (1997) argues that Brinson et al (1986that Brinson et al ( , 1991 analyse the wrong question, focusing on the return variability explained by asset allocation rather than on the level of return. 2 More recently, Nuttall (2000) and Jahnke (2000) state that Brinson et al studies bear responsibility for the confusion surrounding the matter because they provide unclear conclusions in their results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%