1950
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(19)36599-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestion and Absorption After Massive Resection of the Small Intestine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large percentage of the dose excreted by this patient is difficult at first to reconcile with her normal faecal nitrogen excretion. This discrepancy is again likely to be due to the use of a fluid oral test dose which might be expected to pass rapidly through the small amount of residual small intestine, whereas food protein, as has been demonstrated after intestinal resection (Althausen, Uyeyama, and Simpson, 1949), may behave differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large percentage of the dose excreted by this patient is difficult at first to reconcile with her normal faecal nitrogen excretion. This discrepancy is again likely to be due to the use of a fluid oral test dose which might be expected to pass rapidly through the small amount of residual small intestine, whereas food protein, as has been demonstrated after intestinal resection (Althausen, Uyeyama, and Simpson, 1949), may behave differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide-ranging and variable effects of extensive resections of small intestine have been discussed in many excellent studies and reviews in the last decade (Althausen, Doig, Uyeyama, and Weiden, 1950;Jackson andLinder, 1951, 1955 his 'ideal' weight of 10.3 kg. equivalent to 3 5 g. of es and period III was five days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to disease in the remaining portions of the gut-for example, Crohn's disease-or formation of blind loops, but Jackson (1958) believes that in the absence of complications the resection of less than two-thirds of the small bowel causes no serious metabolic disturbances. After massive resection large losses of faecal nitrogen occur; these may be a a s 50% of the nitrogen intak and amino-acid tolerance tests are abnormal (Altha sen, Uyeyama and Simpson, 1949). Perhaps the most striking feature of reported cases is that within a few months of massive resection, bowel movements, initially 20 or so a day, return to normal and patients often regain their pre-operative body weights.…”
Section: Secretion On Protein Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%