1999
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/70.6.1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestion and absorption of 2 fat emulsions with different droplet sizes in the human digestive tract

Abstract: Fat emulsions behave differently in the digestive tract depending on their initial physicochemical properties. A lower initial fat droplet size facilitates fat digestion by gastric lipase in the stomach and duodenal lipolysis. Overall fat assimilation in healthy subjects is not affected by differences in initial droplet size because of efficient fat digestion by pancreatic lipase in the small intestine. Nevertheless, these new observations could be of interest in the enteral nutrition of subjects suffering fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
302
3
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
26
302
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, studies that have measured changes in different lipoprotein subfractions have revealed important differences with lipemic responses being of the order saturated fatty acid (SFA)4monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA)4PUFA (Jackson et al, 2002a, b;Jackson et al, 2005). It is important to note that the physicochemical characteristics of the meal-fat mixture, linked to the fatty acid composition, could be a highly determinant of the rate of digestion and absorption, thus on the extent and/or kinetic of the postprandial lipid response (Sakr et al, 1997;Armand et al, 1999). N-3 PUFAs can lower the postprandial triglyceride response if sufficient amount is present within the test meal (Zampelas et al, 1994a), but levels used were far greater than those which would be consumed by most populations.…”
Section: Dietary Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, studies that have measured changes in different lipoprotein subfractions have revealed important differences with lipemic responses being of the order saturated fatty acid (SFA)4monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA)4PUFA (Jackson et al, 2002a, b;Jackson et al, 2005). It is important to note that the physicochemical characteristics of the meal-fat mixture, linked to the fatty acid composition, could be a highly determinant of the rate of digestion and absorption, thus on the extent and/or kinetic of the postprandial lipid response (Sakr et al, 1997;Armand et al, 1999). N-3 PUFAs can lower the postprandial triglyceride response if sufficient amount is present within the test meal (Zampelas et al, 1994a), but levels used were far greater than those which would be consumed by most populations.…”
Section: Dietary Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, lipid moieties are organized in different kind of complex structures (emulsified droplets with different compositions and sizes, multilamelar structures, vesicles) that will determine the rate of fat digestion by gut lipases (Armand et al, 1996(Armand et al, , 1999. This can affect the rate of gastric emptying as well as kinetics of postprandial occurrence of chylomicrons in the circulation (Sakr et al, 1997;Armand et al, 1999). Great care should be taken on this aspect in designing test meals and postprandial studies.…”
Section: Physicochemical Properties Of Test Mealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolic development may have been modulated by differences in absorption and digestion kinetics. In adults, small lipid droplets from a fat emulsion were hydrolyzed faster than larger lipid droplets (39), whereas small IMF lipid droplets without a PL coating were hydrolyzed more slowly in preterm infants than large HM milk lipid droplets with a native membrane (40). This suggests that (i) size and surface composition play a differential role in digestion kinetics and (ii) these are differentially handled in early childhood and adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, authors hypothesized that emulsion droplets size and interface could modify digestion kinetics. At this stage, limited and quite conflicting results had been published on milk emulsion digestion (Armand et al, 1996(Armand et al, , 1999 suggesting that adult would digest faster small droplets based emulsion which would not be the case for infants. Since then, these results have been fully clarified and will be summarized in Section 3.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%