1977
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80072-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestion of tropomyosin with trypsin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fragments have also lost the ability to bind to actin, in agreement with the results of Gorecka and Drabikowski (1977) for fragments prepared by tryptic digestion. The N-terminal fragment does not combine with troponin but there is some evidence for an interaction between the C-terminal fragment and troponin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The fragments have also lost the ability to bind to actin, in agreement with the results of Gorecka and Drabikowski (1977) for fragments prepared by tryptic digestion. The N-terminal fragment does not combine with troponin but there is some evidence for an interaction between the C-terminal fragment and troponin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This increased unfolding in disulfide-cross-linked tropomyosin appears to be related to an increase in tryptic cleavage at certain sites (Gorecka & Drabikowski, 1977;Ueno, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the stability is not uniform along the length of the molecule as heat and salt denaturation studies, calorimetric measurements of the intact molecule as well as peptides, motions of tropomyosin in the crystal lattice, and preferential sites of proteolytic digestion show (Ooi, 1967;Wood, 1969;Pont & Woods, 1971;Eckard & Cowgill, 1976; 0006-296018 5 10424-3 305$0 1.50/0 Gorecka & Drabikowski, 1977;Pato & Smillie, 1978;Ueno & Ooi, 1978;Phillips et al, 1979Phillips et al, , 1981Edwards & Sykes, 1980;Pato et al, 1981;Williams & Swenson, 1981;Potekhin & Privalov, 1982;Stewart & Roberts, 1983;Ueno, 1984). The results of many experiments indicate that the COOH-terminal half of the molecule is less stable than the NH2-terminal half.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A region of preferential instability surrounds Cys-190, interpreted to be due to localized chain separation (Betcher-Lange & Lehrer, 1978; Lehrer, 1978; Betteridge & Lehrer, 1983). The state of oxidation or type of modification of the cysteines can have long-range effects: it can alter the susceptibility to proteolysis in the region 60 residues toward the NH2-terminus (Gorecka & Drabikowski, 1977;Ueno, 1984); the NMR resonance of histidine-153, 5.5 nm toward the NH2-terminus, is changed (Edwards & Sykes, 1980), and the degree of polymerization that involves the extreme ends of the molecule is affected (Graceffa & Lehrer, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%