Digging deeper: Assessing the predictive power of common greenhouse gas accounting tools for soil carbon sequestration under organic amendment

Ball, K.R.; Burke, I.C.; Collins, D.P.; Kruger, C.E.; Yorgey, G.G.

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139448

Journal of Cleaner Production

2023

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139448

|View full text |Cite

Digging deeper: Assessing the predictive power of common greenhouse gas accounting tools for soil carbon sequestration under organic amendment

K.R. Ball,

I.C. Burke,

D.P. Collins

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

How could payments for U.S. climate-smart farming practices change the regional adoption of conservation practices?

Burnett,

Sichko,

Gramig

et al. 2024

Environ. Res. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent U.S. policies have promoted climate-smart farming practices. However, little is known about the costs of practice adoption or the regional allocation of support. The primary objective of this study is to identify cost-effective agricultural practices for climate mitigation and determine where practices might be targeted regionally. This study uses marginal abatement cost curves for six mitigation practices to analyze how conservation funding could incentivize adoption. Using a social benefit threshold of $51 per metric ton, we estimate that a combined total (across each of the practices) of 90 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions could be cost-effectively mitigated or sequestered annually. For the purposes of conservation targeting, we outline the regions where the adoption of these practices is potentially the most cost-effective.

show abstract

How could payments for U.S. climate-smart farming practices change the regional adoption of conservation practices?

Burnett,

Sichko,

Gramig

et al. 2024

Environ. Res. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Digging deeper: Assessing the predictive power of common greenhouse gas accounting tools for soil carbon sequestration under organic amendment

Cited by 1 publication

References 36 publications

How could payments for U.S. climate-smart farming practices change the regional adoption of conservation practices?

How could payments for U.S. climate-smart farming practices change the regional adoption of conservation practices?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About