2004
DOI: 10.1177/0887302x0402200111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Apparel Design Process: Placing a New Technology Into a Framework for the Creative Design Process

Abstract: Design methodology and process are studied in different contexts and diverse fields. Designing has the potential to generate new knowledge and is intimately tied to new technologies, such as digital textile printing. These open up a constantly expanding range of creative possibilities, and generate a complex set of decision points for designers. In this paper we show how the design process is impacted and how new products can be created through exploration of the limits and potentials of digital technologies f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One key distinction from earlier examinations of design processes related to textiles and apparel is that the present study examined the perspectives of professionals working in the industry, rather than the perspectives of educators or design students (Gam et al, 2009;LaBat and Sokolowski, 1999;Parsons and Campbell, 2004;Lamb andKallal, 1992, Watkins, 1988). Differences in research participants and product focus (textiles vs. apparel) aside, however, accounts of the design process as provided by both conventional and DfEoriented professional designers of interior textiles were, to some degree, consistent with accounts reported in prior research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One key distinction from earlier examinations of design processes related to textiles and apparel is that the present study examined the perspectives of professionals working in the industry, rather than the perspectives of educators or design students (Gam et al, 2009;LaBat and Sokolowski, 1999;Parsons and Campbell, 2004;Lamb andKallal, 1992, Watkins, 1988). Differences in research participants and product focus (textiles vs. apparel) aside, however, accounts of the design process as provided by both conventional and DfEoriented professional designers of interior textiles were, to some degree, consistent with accounts reported in prior research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences from prior research were revealed with respect to the depth and specificity of considerations noted by participants when addressing individual themes or stages. For example, although prior research on the design process as it relates to textiles and apparel generally includes a stage related to material exploration (Gam et al, 2009;Labat and Sokolowski, 1999;Lamb and Kallal, 1992;Parsons and Campbell, 2004), discussion of the specific activities and decision-making at this stage is somewhat limited. In this study, when participants addressed creative exploration, they frequently spoke to the importance of multiple product qualities (e.g., aesthetics, performance, environmental impact) that guide material selection and how these qualities impact final design decisions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike scientific inquiry, to which design methodology has sometimes been compared, design is about innovation rather than an interrogation into the nature of what exists (Parsons and Campbell 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images travel flawlessly over the seams the same way digital images are manipulated (Parsons & Campbell, 2004). The collaged pattern pieces were then scanned into Photoshop and placed on the fabric marker in Illustrator.…”
Section: Proceedingsmentioning
confidence: 99%