2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.04.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital discrimination of neutrons and -rays in liquid scintillators using pulse gradient analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As another verification, we apply the PGA method to the same pulses dataset. PGA method, introduced in [3], is recognized as an efficient n=c discrimination method with a high FoM. The slower decay of the light function of a scintillator for a neutron interaction than that for a c-ray interaction is exploited in this method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As another verification, we apply the PGA method to the same pulses dataset. PGA method, introduced in [3], is recognized as an efficient n=c discrimination method with a high FoM. The slower decay of the light function of a scintillator for a neutron interaction than that for a c-ray interaction is exploited in this method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S is the separation between the peaks of the two events, FWHM c is the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of the spread of events classified as gamma-rays and FWHM n is the FWHM of the spread in the neutron peak [3]. FWHMs are calculated using the Gaussian fits to the neutron and gamma-ray events on experimental distribution plot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the performance of the methods introduced in this article, we apply PGA method to the same pulse data sets as used for the methods in this paper. PGA method, introduced in [3], is recognized as an efficient n/γ-ray discrimination method with a high FoM. The slower decay of the light function of a scintillator for a neutron interaction than that for a γ-ray interaction is exploited in this method.…”
Section: Improved Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has already been done on the problem of discrimination of digitally acquired / pulses [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Neutron pulses have a delayed component (tail) compared to gamma pulses, and similar to analog electronics two or more parameters are typically extracted from the pulses to judge whether they are neutron or gamma pulses.…”
Section: Parametrization Of Ls Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…refs. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. A comparison of four common algorithms for pulse shape discrimination is given in [21] demonstrating the capabilities of each approach.…”
Section: Parametrization Of Ls Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%