2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital disruption of optimal co-innovation configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved innovation performance is only supported if businesses become better able to sense and react to the environment (Guo, Yin, & Liu, 2023a). However, digital competency was found to interfere with the configuration of co-innovation for successful innovation, facilitating the development of efficient vertical and horizontal co-innovation trajectories (Lafuente et al, 2023). So, the innovation emphasized in this research is innovation independently rather than collaboratively.…”
Section: Digital Platform Capability Holistic Innovation Capability A...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Improved innovation performance is only supported if businesses become better able to sense and react to the environment (Guo, Yin, & Liu, 2023a). However, digital competency was found to interfere with the configuration of co-innovation for successful innovation, facilitating the development of efficient vertical and horizontal co-innovation trajectories (Lafuente et al, 2023). So, the innovation emphasized in this research is innovation independently rather than collaboratively.…”
Section: Digital Platform Capability Holistic Innovation Capability A...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The RBV-based SME competitiveness methodology adapted and improved by GCP, was first introduced by Szerb et al (2014). Since then, the GCP approach has been applied to the study of family firms (Moreno-Gómez and Lafuente, 2019), to non-parametric efficiency analysis (Lafuente and Vaillant, 2021), to the analysis of configurations of resources and capabilities (Lafuente et al , 2020a; Lafuente et al , 2020b), to analyse cross-variable correlations of competitiveness (Dvouletý and Blažková, 2021), to understand the peculiarities of SME digitalisation (Lányi et al , 2021; Lafuente et al , 2023), to research relationships of marketing strategies and competitiveness (Moreno-Gómez et al , 2023), to the quantification of intellectual capital and the empirical analysis of innovation relationships (Rideg et al , 2023), to the empirical analysis of RBV product innovation (Lukovszki et al , 2021) and to evaluate the co-innovation trajectory of firms adopting different collaborative innovation networks (Lafuente et al , 2023).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mexico and the Russian Federation demonstrate commitment in the field (16 and 15 documents, respectively), but with varying impact, as Mexico had 22 citations and Russia had none [70,[99][100][101]. Portugal, the United States, and France round out the list, with France standing out due to a high number of citations (167), despite having fewer documents (10), indicating highly influential research [69,[102][103][104][105].…”
Section: Analysis Of Trends Impacts and Geographic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%