2010
DOI: 10.4056/sigs.531120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison

Abstract: The pragmatic species concept for Bacteria and Archaea is ultimately based on DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH). While enabling the taxonomist, in principle, to obtain an estimate of the overall similarity between the genomes of two strains, this technique is tedious and error-prone and cannot be used to incrementally build up a comparative database. Recent technological progress in the area of genome sequencing calls for bioinformatics methods to replace the wet-lab DDH by in-silico genome-to-genome comparison. Her… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

33
1,238
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,447 publications
(1,277 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
33
1,238
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The digital DNA-DNA hybridizations (DDH) were determined online at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculation (GGDC) version 2.0 as described in Meier- Kolthoff et al (2013). The estimated DDH values were calculated using formula two at the GGDC website, originally described in Auch et al (2010) and updated in Meier- Kolthoff et al (2013). Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) was performed as previously described (Goris et al, 2007), with the following options; minimum length 700 bp, minimum identity 70 %, minimum alignment 50 %, BLAST window size 1000 bp and step size of 200 bp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital DNA-DNA hybridizations (DDH) were determined online at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculation (GGDC) version 2.0 as described in Meier- Kolthoff et al (2013). The estimated DDH values were calculated using formula two at the GGDC website, originally described in Auch et al (2010) and updated in Meier- Kolthoff et al (2013). Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) was performed as previously described (Goris et al, 2007), with the following options; minimum length 700 bp, minimum identity 70 %, minimum alignment 50 %, BLAST window size 1000 bp and step size of 200 bp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Celera Assembler (version 7.0) was used for assembly (Myers et al, 2000). The degree of pairwise genome-based relatedness was estimated by both the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value following the BLAST-based ANI calculation method described by Goris et al (2007) and the genome-to-genome distance calculation method described by Auch et al (2010). The genomic DNA G+C content was calculated directly from the genome sequence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated DDH values were calculated using formula two at the GGDC website, originally described by Auch et al (2010) and updated by Meier-Kolthoff et al (2013). Formula two of the GGDC is the only function appropriate to analyse draft genomes, which is the case for most of the genomes in this study (Meier-Kolthoff et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%