2017
DOI: 10.3386/w23684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Economics

Abstract: We thank Andrey Fradkin and Kristina McElheran for helpful comments. We are grateful to the Sloan Foundation for its support of the NBER Digitization Initiative, which built the research community around which this review is based. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 280 publications
(332 reference statements)
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Einav et al 2016and Goldfarb and Tucker (2017) provide great surveys on how digital technology has reduced matching frictions and improved market efficiency. Reduced matching frictions affect price dispersion, as evidenced in Brynjolfsson and Smith (2000), Brown and Goolsbee (2002), Overby and Forman (2014), Ghose and Yao (2011), and Cavallo (2017).…”
Section: Peer-to-peer Platforms and Matching Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Einav et al 2016and Goldfarb and Tucker (2017) provide great surveys on how digital technology has reduced matching frictions and improved market efficiency. Reduced matching frictions affect price dispersion, as evidenced in Brynjolfsson and Smith (2000), Brown and Goolsbee (2002), Overby and Forman (2014), Ghose and Yao (2011), and Cavallo (2017).…”
Section: Peer-to-peer Platforms and Matching Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing part of economic and business processes currently is driven by digital technologies. "Digital economics explores how standard economic models change as certain costs fall substantially and perhaps approach zero" (Goldfarb et al, 2017). The digital economy might already be delivering minimum 20% of the global GDP; the European digital economy is growing 7 times as fast as the rest of the economy (WEB, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1990s and early 2000s several authors declared that the ‘death of distance’ was near (Cairncross ), the world was increasingly becoming ‘flat’ (Friedman ), and that geography and proximity seemed to matter less and less, as a result of advances in IT and continuing globalisation. The economic and geographic literature concerned with this question continued to emphasise the ways in which distance still seems to matter (Goldfarb & Tucker ). It is, for instance, generally argued that tele or online communication complements face‐to‐face encounters, and that the increasing need for encounters offsets the decentralising effects of IT (Gaspar & Glaeser ; Leamer & Storper ).…”
Section: Agglomeration Online Reviews and Cuisine Varietymentioning
confidence: 99%