2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital elevation data for estimation of potential wetness in ridged fields—Comparison of two different methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LiDAR precision was approximately ± 5 cm. The resolution chosen for the estimations of hydrological divides and catchment surface areas was 10 m. Sink removal and flow accumulation calculations were performed using a form‐based model (Pilesjö et al ., ) prior to locating watercourses and catchment delineations. Watercourses and catchment delineations were estimated with hydro tools in the ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 package (ArcINFO version) and were confirmed through ground observations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LiDAR precision was approximately ± 5 cm. The resolution chosen for the estimations of hydrological divides and catchment surface areas was 10 m. Sink removal and flow accumulation calculations were performed using a form‐based model (Pilesjö et al ., ) prior to locating watercourses and catchment delineations. Watercourses and catchment delineations were estimated with hydro tools in the ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 package (ArcINFO version) and were confirmed through ground observations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the accuracy of the DEM in relation to the slope of the terrain the evaluation points were divided into six subsets, corresponding to six slope intervals. Slopes were calculated according to (Pilesjo et al, 2006). Slopes with gradients from 0 to 50 degrees were divided into five equal intervals, while the sixth interval consisted of slopes steeper than 50 degrees.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Dem For Terrain With Different Slopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three different DEM resolutions were used to investigate the relationship between the estimates of the slope and drainage area, (Pilesjo et al, 2006) on the one hand, and the DEM resolution on the other. Resolutions of 10, 30 and 90 m were used, due to the overlapping evaluation centre cell points for these resolutions (i.e.…”
Section: Relationship Between the Slope And Drainage Area For Differementioning
confidence: 99%
“…soil moisture and saturated area) (Grabs et al, 2009) as well as plant distribution (Zinko, 2004;Zinko et al, 2005). Algorithms have also been developed to better simulate water movement (Quinn et al, 1995;Pilesjö et al, 1998Pilesjö et al, , 2006Pilesjö and Hasan, 2013), yielding more reliable indices. However, topographical indices can only represent topographical effects on soil moisture as well as plant distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%