2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2009.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital enterprise solution for integrated production planning and control

Abstract: Digital enterprise technologies combined with sophisticated optimization algorithms can significantly contribute to the efficiency of production. The paper introduces a novel approach for integrated production planning and control, with the description of the mathematical models and solution algorithms. The deterministic optimization algorithms are complemented by a discrete-event simulation system to assess solution robustness in case of disturbances. The methods are illustrated by describing two prototype sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors: [18,21,23,27,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] have identified a number of unexpected events and partially or completely agree with Darmoul et al [26]. In the literature, an additional specific unexpected event, production time variation, has also been proposed [ 21,23,25,31,37,38]. This event can be added to the "production" typology.…”
Section: Hierarchical Production Planning (Hpp)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A number of authors: [18,21,23,27,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] have identified a number of unexpected events and partially or completely agree with Darmoul et al [26]. In the literature, an additional specific unexpected event, production time variation, has also been proposed [ 21,23,25,31,37,38]. This event can be added to the "production" typology.…”
Section: Hierarchical Production Planning (Hpp)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Due to complex production processes and long lead times, production often starts before the overall project design has been completed (Monostori et al, 2010). Management must rely on a rough estimation of the impact of an incoming order on resource utilisation and eventually must adjust capacity, as micro process planning (i.e., detailed technological planning of production activities that result in manufacturing instructions - Giebels, 2000) has not been performed yet (Zijm, 2000;Grabenstetter & Usher, 2014).…”
Section: An Overview In Etomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, order acceptance and capacity planning decisions are often functionally separated, according to Ebben et al (2005) and Huang et al (2011), since the sales department is responsible for order acceptance and the production department takes care of production and capacity planning. For instance, Monostori et al (2010) affirm that project planners typically try to sequence activities as early as possible, relying on the conventional wisdom that it can never be wrong to get work done early.…”
Section: An Overview In Etomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions obtained at this level are suboptimal at the multiple facility level. In order to obtain an optimal solution at the latter level, the scope of optimisation must be enlarged to model the multiple facility supply chain of the enterprise as a whole, including the interaction with suppliers and customers; see for example (Laínez et al, 2010), Munõz et al , (2011), Stray et al, (2006), and Monostori et al, (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%