2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach

Abstract: We present strategies for recognizing common adverse filter effects and filter artifacts and demonstrate them in practical examples. Best practices and recommendations for the selection and reporting of filter parameters, limitations, and alternatives to filtering are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
458
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(461 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
458
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrophysiological data were processed with the EEGLAB toolbox (Delorme and Makeig, 2004) for Matlab (MathWorks Inc., Natick, USA). After changing the sampling rate to 512 Hz (with Biosemi Decimator 86), the data was high-pass and low-pass filtered using Hamming-windowed sinc FIR filters with 0.3 Hz and 30 Hz cutoff frequencies, respectively (Widmann et al, 2015;Widmann and Schröger, 2012). Epochs starting at 100 ms before stimulus onset, and ending at 1300 ms after stimulus onset, were extracted, with baseline correction based on the whole epoch length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrophysiological data were processed with the EEGLAB toolbox (Delorme and Makeig, 2004) for Matlab (MathWorks Inc., Natick, USA). After changing the sampling rate to 512 Hz (with Biosemi Decimator 86), the data was high-pass and low-pass filtered using Hamming-windowed sinc FIR filters with 0.3 Hz and 30 Hz cutoff frequencies, respectively (Widmann et al, 2015;Widmann and Schröger, 2012). Epochs starting at 100 ms before stimulus onset, and ending at 1300 ms after stimulus onset, were extracted, with baseline correction based on the whole epoch length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal bandpass filtering was also applied, set at 2-120 Hz for EEG data and 2-30 Hz for the motion sensors. The choice of a highpass cutoff of 2 Hz was motivated by preliminary tests showing that increasing the cutoff frequency improved motion artifact estimation, likely due to reduced biases from slow-drift contributions; this compromise comes at the cost of excluding EEG information from part of the delta band, but did not affect VEP morphology (Widmann et al, 2015). The choice of a lowpass cutoff of 30 Hz for the motion sensors was again based on insights from part I, pointing that this is the relevant frequency band for motion contributions.…”
Section: Part Ii: Optimization Of Motion Artifact Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency response of Butterworth filters has no ripple in the passband and is extremely flat. The minimum order of the filter is applied to yield a precise and significantly effective design [127,128]. The minimum order and cutoff frequencies are defined as (1) and (2) respectively.…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%