Digital Finance and Green Development: Characteristics, Mechanisms, and Empirical Evidences

Abstract

As the emergence of digital finance is relatively short, research results on digital finance mainly focus on products, services, coverage, policies, etc. The mechanism and role of digital finance in influencing green development are still lacking attention. In the above context, this paper used spatial analysis methods to describe spatiotemporal characteristics in detail, and empirically tested the mechanism and path of digital finance affecting green development through spatial econometric models and intermediary models. The results showed that: (1) During the study period, digital finance and green development have been improved to varying degrees, but the inter-provincial differences are still obvious. (2) The spatial trends of digital finance and green development are similar, and the overall performance is “high in the east, low in the west, high in the south, and low in the north”. (3) The empirical tests found that digital finance is an effective force to reduce energy consumption per unit of GDP and improve the level of green development. It validates Hypothesis 1. Meanwhile, the Heterogeneity effect is noteworthy due to different regions, types, and levels. (4) The promotion of green development by digital finance is mainly concentrated in the local region and has not yet shown a significant green spillover effect for surrounding areas. It validates Hypothesis 2. (5) Energy structure, industrial upgrading, and technological progress are three paths for digital finance affecting green development. Hypothesis 3 is verified. Finally, the innovation of this paper lies in the design of the research framework, diversity of research methods, and policy implications. The main contribution is to enrich and expand the environmental finance theory and provide detailed empirical evidence. In addition, we put forward effective measures and suggestions including local governments, financial institutions, and enterprises based on the empirical results. Local governments should pay attention to policy implementation and operation effects, financial institutions constantly need to strengthen the supply of advanced digital financial products and services, and enterprises should attach importance to the use of digital financial tools to achieve green and low-carbon development in the future.

How Environmental Regulation Affects Pollution Reduction and Carbon Reduction Synergies—An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Data

“…Therefore, this paper adopted the traditional stepwise regression method to test the potential transmission mechanism of the impact of environmental regulation on the synergistic effect of pollution and carbon reduction. According to the research method described in "Digital Economy, TI and the Green Economy in Cities: An Empirical Analysis Using a Spatial Measurement Model and the Intermediary Effect" [52,53], a mediating-effects model, shown below, was constructed.…”

Evaluation of coupling coordination development between digital economy and green finance: Evidence from 30 provinces in China

“…Likewise, by leveraging technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, the processes involved in green finance could also be optimized, ensuring information transparency, risk control, and efficiently managing investment and financing, as well as improving fund utilization [32]. What's more, Zhuang et al (2022) [33] and [34] proposed that regulatory agencies and financial institutions played critical roles in the era of the digital economy, because they were responsible for establishing digital financial standards and guidelines, in addition to offering digital financial products and services to promote the growth of green finance.…”

Impact of Digital Finance on Industrial Green Transformation: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt

“…Further, there is a non-linear relationship between DF and haze pollution reduction. Zhuang et al discovered through an empirical study that DF is an important driving force behind reducing energy consumption per unit of GDP and improving green development [43]. He et al used provincial panel data to find that DF can significantly improve green development efficiency, and industrial structure upgrading is its transmission path [44].…”