2020
DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2020.1802408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital flesh: a feminist approach to the body in cyberspace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…present to many students not as flat walls [emphasis in original] on which flat, bodily, disconnected images are posted, but as spaces similar to physical rooms and places" (p. 83). Yoon (2021) offers the term digital flesh in arguing for experiences of embodiment, including the perpetuation of gendered cultural biases, in online spaces and against the often invoked in-person/online binary in digital spaces. In Yoon's view, "what technology-based classrooms lack is not our bodily presence but technological artifacts that acknowledge the sensoriality of virtual experience" and enable "collective access to meaningful materials" (p. 5).…”
Section: Becoming Digital Posthumansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…present to many students not as flat walls [emphasis in original] on which flat, bodily, disconnected images are posted, but as spaces similar to physical rooms and places" (p. 83). Yoon (2021) offers the term digital flesh in arguing for experiences of embodiment, including the perpetuation of gendered cultural biases, in online spaces and against the often invoked in-person/online binary in digital spaces. In Yoon's view, "what technology-based classrooms lack is not our bodily presence but technological artifacts that acknowledge the sensoriality of virtual experience" and enable "collective access to meaningful materials" (p. 5).…”
Section: Becoming Digital Posthumansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echoing common themes of disembodiment, lack of presence, and diminished affect in online learning discourse (Bayne et al, 2020;Yoon, 2021), Strom et al (2018) described their Google Hangouts gatherings as an "often disembodied experience" (p. 143), which I hoped to avoid in my own CI. Here "technology constrained [their] interactions in emphasizing the disembodied images of [them] selves, creating a barrier to [their] understanding of [their] embodied emotions" (p. 150).…”
Section: Experiencing Affective Embodiment Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este sentido, el ciberespacio es un lugar generizado en el cual se ejercen relaciones de poder y se evidencian las desigualdades y las brechas materiales del mundo análogo: lo físico y lo virtual son ámbitos políticos, contextuales y performativos (Gajjala y Mamidipudi, 1999). Así, por ejemplo, es posible cuestionar los ámbitos de imaginación y creación de la tecnología de software como un área que ha perpetuado los fundamentos heteropatriarcales del mundo análogo (Yoon, 2021), reproduciendo representaciones estereotipadas y convencionales del ideal masculino, occidental y blanco. El ciberfeminismo busca transformar estas representaciones por otras que sean más fluidas, multitextuales e híbridas (Wajcman, 2010).…”
Section: Fundamentaciónunclassified
“…Como consecuencia, tanto la industria tecnológica como los espacios virtuales -o ciberespacios-se han creado a imagen y semejanza del ideal masculino heterosexual occidental (Wajcman, 2009;Yoon, 2021), propiciando, entre otras cuestiones, una epidemia digital de cibersexismo y cibermachismo, misoginia, homofobia y racismo (Penny, 2017). De esta forma, las subjetividades que habitan el ciberespacio, como diría Zafra (2017), han encontrado lugares cómodos para distintas categorías de anti o fobia, que promueven la violencia, discriminación y exclusión de colectivos (Luchadoras MX, Barrera y Rodríguez, 2017).…”
Section: Internet Como Espacio En Disputaunclassified