Digital Health Competencies Among Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background Digitalization is not fully implemented in clinical practice, and several factors have been identified as possible barriers, including the competencies of health care professionals. However, no summary of the available evidence has been provided to date to depict digital health competencies that have been investigated among health care professionals, the tools used in assessing such competencies, and the effective interventions to improve them. Objective This review aims to summarize digital health competencies investigated to date and the tools used to assess them among health care professionals. Methods A systematic review based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist was performed. The MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases were accessed up to September 4, 2021. Studies assessing digital health competencies with quantitative designs, targeting health care professionals, and written in English were included. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results A total of 26 studies, published from 1999 to 2021, met the inclusion criteria, and the majority were cross sectional in design, while only 2 were experimental study designs. Most studies were assessed with moderate to low methodological quality; 4 categories and 9 subcategories of investigated digital health competencies have been identified. The most investigated category was “Self-rated competencies,” followed by “Psychological and emotional aspects toward digital technologies,” “Use of digital technologies,” and “Knowledge about digital technologies.” In 35% (9/26) of the studies, a previously validated tool was used to measure the competencies assessed, while others developed ad hoc questionnaires. Conclusions Mainly descriptive studies with issues regarding methodology quality have been produced to date investigating 4 main categories of digital health competencies mostly with nonvalidated tools. Competencies investigated might be considered while designing curricula for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education processes, whereas the methodological lacks detected might be addressed with future research. There is a need to expand research on psychological and emotional elements and the ability to use digital technology to self-learn and teach others. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021282775; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=282775

Healthcare professionals’ digital health competence and its core factors; development and psychometric testing of two instruments

“…This definition based on two systematic reviews was used as a foundation in the conceptual framework of the newly developed instruments with supporting literature, especially from qualitative studies [4,5]. It has been noted that there is a shortage of validated instruments on digital health competence [51]. Moreover, previous instruments that have been validated lack a generic definition of digital health competence concerning different healthcare professionals.…”

The Widening Gap between the Digital Capability of the Care Workforce and Technology-Enabled Healthcare Delivery: A Nursing and Allied Health Analysis

“…One of the greatest challenges to the care economy since the COVID-19 pandemic has been to ensure the health workforce has sufficient capability, knowledge, and skills to deliver digitally enabled healthcare delivery [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. While technology provides the opportunity for improved health care, health workers are essential for implementing the technology into productive use [ 6 , 19 , 20 ].…”

A perspective of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and public health

“…MOOC content developed in collaboration with stakeholders, a design process coined as co-creation, offers a viable method of developing course material tailored to the needs of a specific population group, such as the MOOC to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Pregnant and Lactating Women ( 51 ). Digital health literacy (DHL) has been referred to as a “super social determinant of health,” ( 52 ) and the use of MOOCs to improve DHL skills of health care professionals ( 53 ) can be an effective strategy, with an opportunity to employ the process of co-creation in its design and development ( 54 ).…”