2012
DOI: 10.2208/jscejmcs.68.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Image Analysis of Cracksonthe Concrete Surface Based on the Gabor Wavelet Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This information is usually available as the first choice of real bridge management data by hand sketch and/or photographs, and most easily obtained at site. Furthermore, the crack information is effectively digitalized with which we may run some numerical methods more easily (Koyama et al 2012).…”
Section: Test Results and Crack Patterns At Bottom Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This information is usually available as the first choice of real bridge management data by hand sketch and/or photographs, and most easily obtained at site. Furthermore, the crack information is effectively digitalized with which we may run some numerical methods more easily (Koyama et al 2012).…”
Section: Test Results and Crack Patterns At Bottom Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no crack data on the lateral face, the authors recommend to assume 0.1% gel volume as an input, or to conduct non-destructive testing such as an acoustic wave velocity, percussion sound and ultrasonic wave detection in the thickness direction. (3) Finally, the visual or camera based inspection data of cracking on the bottom face of the slab (Koyama et al 2012) is converted to the smeared strain field. This converted digital data is addressed to the pseudo-cracking procedure , and finally, the remaining lifetime is obtained as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Scheme Of Data Assimilation For Asr Damaged Decksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is usually available as the first choice of real bridge management data by hand sketch and/or photographs, and most easily obtained at site. Furthermore, the crack information is effectively digitalized with which we may run some numerical methods more easily (Koyama et al 2012). As the crack information is obvious and self-evident as inspection data, it would be no need to explain further.…”
Section: Test Results and Visual Inspection Datamentioning
confidence: 99%