2016
DOI: 10.1177/2380084416645291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Imaging Capability for Caries Detection

Abstract: Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study will help clinicians make an evidence-based decision when deciding which digital radiography system to use when evaluating interproximal caries. Time, patient radiation safety, cost, and image quality are factors to be considered. The performance of the different available digital imaging systems was compared with the current gold standard-a histologic analysisvia meta-analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated by previous studies, the radiographic detection of incipient caries lesions is challenging, which possibly explains our reduced diagnostic values. 4,10,20 ROC curve (Az values) is influenced by sensitivity and specificity values and, in the present study, was around 0.6, which is similar to the results of previous studies. 9,10 The low sensitivity and high specificity suggest that the clinicians may underestimate early proximal lesions visualizing digital bitewing radiographic images 4 irrespective of the file format.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As demonstrated by previous studies, the radiographic detection of incipient caries lesions is challenging, which possibly explains our reduced diagnostic values. 4,10,20 ROC curve (Az values) is influenced by sensitivity and specificity values and, in the present study, was around 0.6, which is similar to the results of previous studies. 9,10 The low sensitivity and high specificity suggest that the clinicians may underestimate early proximal lesions visualizing digital bitewing radiographic images 4 irrespective of the file format.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…An intraoral digital radiograph can be acquired with digital imaging receptors of different types: sensor (charge-coupled device, CCD; complementary metal-oxide semiconductors; CMOS) and phosphor storage plate (PSP). [1][2][3][4] The benefits of digital radiography over the conventional method using analogue film comprise the absence of chemical processing, reduction of the radiation dose delivered to the patient, and the possibility of post-processing image enhancement (e.g. brightness, contrast, and filters), digital storage, and online transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital intraoral imaging provides practitioners with several clinical advantages, including increasing workflow with no significant detriment to clinical efficacy versus conventional techniques 1 , 2 . However, these advantages come with their own set of challenges 3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%