Digital Innovation During Terror and Crises

Abstract

Terror attacks are moments of chaos and destabilization. From a journalistic perspective, terror attacks disrupt everyday news work where journalists find themselves struggling to restore order and report the event at hand as accurate and speedy as possible. From the perspective of the affected audience, journalism fills vital functions in making sense of the attack, by responding to a complex and rapidly changing mix of social needs. In this article, we explore how such disrupting events as terror can contribute to newsroom innovation in terms of journalistic processes, journalistic products, and even journalistic genres. We use the terror attack and massacre in Norway on 22 July 2011 as a case study, as it to a large extent forced journalists to think outside the box in order to meet the audience's informational and rhetorical needs. The study shows that innovation is tightly connected to the development of the rhetorical situation through three phases: shock, start-up, and transformation. The analysis is based on qualitative interviews with journalists who covered the attack, as well as a rhetorical exploration of the evolving situational context and the texts that were created in response.

Framing of COVID-19 in Newspapers: A Perspective from the US-Mexico Border

“…Against the backdrop of a disease outbreak, a knowledgeable and involved public is essential for maintaining public health [ 3 ]. Prior research has explored how journalistic creativity is sparked during such emergencies [ 4 ]. However, given its vast reach, the absence of a disaster epicenter, harm to human lives, and the capacity to inflict damage across the bulk of capitalistic sectors, the COVID-19 pandemic posed a unique confluence of these factors.…”

Journalism as Usual? Managing Disruption in Virtual Newsrooms during the COVID-19 Crisis

“…A small number of innovations, mostly at digital-only outlets, related to automating processes, such as fact-checking and the handling of reader verification requests, and organizational improvements, such as multidisciplinary teams integrated in the design of new products and the implementation of agile project development methodologies. In line with recent research (Westlund, Krumsvik, and Lewis 2021), news work routines demanded coordination among a diverse set of journalists and technologists to accomplish organizational goals; multidisciplinary teams worked together to respond to the demands during a crisis (Konow-Lund, Hågvar, and Olsson 2019).…”

“…Research shows that a crisis might alter journalists' predispositions towards certain sources (Van der Meer et al 2017), challenge journalistic practices (Sorribes and Rovira 2011), and contribute to innovation in terms of processes, products, and genres (Konow-Lund, Hågvar, and Olsson 2019). One effect of news companies' restructuring is often a restructuring of power relations which tends to make some parts of the organization more important than others (Sood, Stockdale, and Rogers 1987).…”

The Dislocation of News Journalism: A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Epistemologies of Digital Journalism

“…Many news publishers have since long broadened their portfolio of proprietary platforms, and extended to non-proprietary platforms like mobile ecosystems and social media platforms (Westlund, 2011). Digital innovation takes place continuously, but also because of critical incidents that challenge news practices (Konow-Lund, Hågvar, & Olsson, 2018). This signals a general shift from a monopolistic situation involving institutional news producers, to a situation in which news and other forms of information are produced and distributed by a larger diversity of actors, including ordinary citizens (Deuze & Witschge, 2017).…”