Digital innovation in the energy industry: The impact of controversies on the evolution of innovation ecosystems

Abstract

The concept of innovation ecosystems gained significant importance in academic research on strategy and practice over the last years. The emergence of the Internet of Things is disrupting industries and setting the ecosystem in the focus of innovation. Even traditional analog industries, like the energy industry, are under pressure to foster and manage ecosystems during their innovation efforts. Thus, the energy industry represents an appropriate setting for examining the evolution of an innovation ecosystem under the empirical lens of controversies, which describe the challenges of the status quo and is congruent with previous research on dialectical inquiries as source of innovation dynamics. For the purpose of this paper, the Actor-network theory (ANT) is regarded as an appropriate tool since it allows researchers to analyze how actors interact due to their specific interests with each other and thus configure the ecosystem in its base. ANT further enlarges the perspective of handling actors, while it involves not only human but also non-human actors (i.e. technologies). This is a valuable and necessary feature while dealing with digital innovations such as virtual power plants (VPP). By analyzing three how distinctive typologies, their mechanisms as well as their pathways of controversies affect the innovation ecosystem of VPPs and the evolution of the technological components of the innovation, this interaction between human and non-human actors is highlighted. In consequence, our research emphasizes the significance of involving nonhuman actors into managerial strategies and the role they inherit for the evolution of ecosystems. Furthermore, the present research reveals that controversies are not only a moderating factor but also a constitutional one for the coevolution of the ecosystem as well as the innovation itself especially during the forming phases. With respect to recent research of the management of digital innovation, this paper contributes to a better understanding of managerial challenges associated with digital innovation and their respective ecosystems.

Exploring Driving Forces of Sustainable Development of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem

“…Digital innovation pressures traditional industry to cultivate and manage an innovative ecosystem during the process of innovation [16]. In addition, the innovation ecosystem is the core of the sustainable development strategy of emerging industries driven by science, technology, and commerce innovation, which are closely connected [13].…”

Shaping Digital Innovation Via Digital-related Capabilities

“…In other words, companies need to find ways to exploit digital innovation. Therefore, the dominant role of digital innovation is being increasingly observed in the business environment due to new opportunities that offer firms the potential to broaden into new and special experiences (Jahanmir and Cavadas 2018;Kolloch and Dellermann 2018;Nylén and Holmström 2015), leading to high profit potential and customer satisfaction (Bednar and Welch 2019;Parida et al 2015). The origins of digital innovation can be traced to digitalization (Chan et al 2019), which acts as an enabler of and creates essential conditions for exploiting digital innovation (Yoo et al 2010).…”

The relationship between the Internet of Things and knowledge management in smart ecosystem development

“…In this sense, the IoT creates a network that not only connects things but also connects all of the stakeholders, ultimately contributing to the evolution of the business ecosystem (Rong et al, 2015). Therefore, we can describe the IoT ecosystem as an evolutionary socio‐economic and technological environment, shared by cross‐industry stakeholders, that provides value to both users and organizations (Kolloch & Dellermann, 2018; Mineraud, Mazhelis, Su, & Tarkoma, 2016).…”

“…The functionality of IoT ecosystems, that enable a Smart environment, need to be viewed on how the technological and human entities interact (Kolloch & Dellermann, 2018), how these components are integrated with the functions and capabilities of new products and services (Porter & Heppelmann, 2014), and how the dynamic interaction among actors, stakeholders, things, and technologies occur while they co‐evolve with each other.…”