2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital innovation: Review and novel perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
69
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
1
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential impact of digital technologies is wide-ranging (see, for example, Hund et al 11 ). First, they allow the interlinkage of devices and components across organisational borders and user groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential impact of digital technologies is wide-ranging (see, for example, Hund et al 11 ). First, they allow the interlinkage of devices and components across organisational borders and user groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adopts the definition of Hund et al (2021), which refers to digital innovations as the creation or adoption, and exploitation of an inherently unbounded, value-adding novelty (e.g., product, service, process, or business model) by incorporating digital technology. From this definition, the researchers argue that the identified metro can enhance public service delivery by implementing new business and service delivery models, new ideas, concepts, and technologies to help bridge poverty and communication gaps.…”
Section: Contextualising Digital Innovations In Public Service Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many practitioners and scholars across various disciplines, including (Economics, Public Administration, Marketing, and Information Systems) have shown a great interest in the phenomenon of digital innovation (Autio et al 2018;72;Bangani & Vyas-Doorgapersad, 2020;Beltagui et al 2020;Hund et al 2021;Konya-Baumback, Schuhmacher, Kuester and Kuharev, 2019:385). Lyytinen et al (2016:47) argue that the pervasiveness of digital technology has not transformed how innovation is strategised and created; instead led to improved development through the combination of both physical and digital components to produce novel products (Yoo, Henfridsson & Lyytinen, 2010:725;Nambisan, Lyytinen & Yoo, 2020).…”
Section: Contextualising Digital Innovations In Public Service Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digitalization is considered a paradigmatic field of innovation [1][2][3][4]. The extent to which digital technologies are assimilated or accepted as innovations and finally can be used profitably, depends on both material conditions (e.g., sufficient infrastructure) and personal factors on the part of the users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which digital technologies are assimilated or accepted as innovations and finally can be used profitably, depends on both material conditions (e.g., sufficient infrastructure) and personal factors on the part of the users. Besides, for example, basic IT operation skills, a reflected use also requires an awareness of the mechanisms and potentials of digital technologies as well as the willingness to deal with ongoing technological progress [2]. Thus, it becomes understandable that a profitable use of digital technologies often requires extensive learning and competence development [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%