2013
DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2012.761703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Life-Story Narratives as Data for Policy Makers and Practitioners: Thinking Through Methodologies for Large-Scale Multimedia Qualitative Datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), a dementia unit (Stenhouse et al . ), and unspecified community settings (Matthews & Sunderland ; Rice et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…), a dementia unit (Stenhouse et al . ), and unspecified community settings (Matthews & Sunderland ; Rice et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Of the remaining four, two were discussion papers (Matthews & Sunderland ; Rice et al . ) and two presented descriptions of projects with no formal evaluation (Evans & Jones ; Sawyer & Willis ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any case, the first phase of the DS process, that is, when the stories are co-produced and a kind of "intimate public" is created through the sharing of universal themes such as life, loss, belonging, hope for the future, friendship, and love offers an experience of inclusion and community building promoting identification among strangers that leads to an experience of sharing and belonging. Matthews and Sunderland (2013) interrogate the afterlives of these stories and suggest that through DS, an abstraction of the storyteller's voice from their physical body happens. The participant's voice, after the initial abstraction is then re-contextualized into a new media.…”
Section: The Ds Workhopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been built into academic research projects with the aim to "[cross] academic boundaries" (Otañez and Guerrero, 2015: 57) (see also the work of Gubrium and DiFluvio (2011) on community health and girlhood studies and Hill (2010) on gender justice). Adopting this method as part of a broader project on the exploration of the question of migrant women volunteers' right to the city in London, we respond to Matthews and Sunderland's (2013) call for more critical academic writing in DS and propose to frame this particular approach as a specifically feminist and participatory data collection tool to be used in qualitative research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%