2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Map Generation and Localization for Vehicles in Urban Intersections using LiDAR and GNSS Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, the feature point method is the more commonly used method, while the direct method has only been proposed in recent years [10]. In the back-end part, SLAM methods usually transform the whole problem into a maximizing a posteriori probability estimation (MAP) problem, using the data association provided by the front-end to estimate both the positional and surrounding environment maps [11]. The back-end estimation methods are generally divided into two types: filtering and optimization.…”
Section: Current Status Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the feature point method is the more commonly used method, while the direct method has only been proposed in recent years [10]. In the back-end part, SLAM methods usually transform the whole problem into a maximizing a posteriori probability estimation (MAP) problem, using the data association provided by the front-end to estimate both the positional and surrounding environment maps [11]. The back-end estimation methods are generally divided into two types: filtering and optimization.…”
Section: Current Status Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= manhole automated detection (manhole + non − manhole automated detection) • 100 (7) The manhole extraction process was applied to Areas 1, 2 and 3 of the study area. A total of 1414 manholes were extracted from area 1, while 237 manholes were extracted from area 2, and 27 manholes from area 3, as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional obstacle clustering methods in video sequences have relied on detecting foreground pixels based on the difference between two successive frames [21,22]. Arvanitidou et al [23] realized an unsupervised moving obstacle clustering system using environmental images captured by a moving camera.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%