1998
DOI: 10.3133/ofr98548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital map of hydraulic conductivity for the High Plains Aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Northern High Plain data set provided spatial heterogeneous data for the upper alluvial aquifer layer only, a value of the underlying hard rock was not given. Most of the regional conductivity values are 1.5 to 3 times higher than the 2014), (d) estimated aquifer thickness (see also Figure 4), (e) regional conductivities of the top aquifer layer (obtained from Cederstrand & Becker, 1998), (f) fractional difference between this study's estimated continental conductivities and the regional conductivities.…”
Section: Test Case Region and Model Runsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This Northern High Plain data set provided spatial heterogeneous data for the upper alluvial aquifer layer only, a value of the underlying hard rock was not given. Most of the regional conductivity values are 1.5 to 3 times higher than the 2014), (d) estimated aquifer thickness (see also Figure 4), (e) regional conductivities of the top aquifer layer (obtained from Cederstrand & Becker, 1998), (f) fractional difference between this study's estimated continental conductivities and the regional conductivities.…”
Section: Test Case Region and Model Runsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…(a) Spatial boundary of the High Plains aquifer, with the case study location indicated by the dark grey box. Model inputs: (b) terrain elevation (meters above sea level, obtained from Lehner & Döll, ), (c) groundwater recharge input, obtained from Condon and Maxwell (), (d) estimated aquifer thickness (see also Figure ), (e) regional conductivities of the top aquifer layer (obtained from Cederstrand & Becker, ), (f) fractional difference between this study's estimated continental conductivities and the regional conductivities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ϕi is the soil type of well i and γr is a fixed effect for the local groundwater management district (GWMD) r. We include GWMD fixed effects to control for unobserved heterogeneity that potentially exists between GWMDs. Hydraulic conductivity (HC) describes the ease with which water moves through a porous medium and HC measures for the study area were obtained from a US Geologic Survey data source (Cederstrand & Becker, ). Specifically, HC is a dummy variable for hydraulic conductivity greater than 20 ft/d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This groundwater elevation is subtracted from the bedrock elevation [ Macfarlane and Wilson , 2006] to obtain the predevelopment saturated thickness presented in the inset maps using contour intervals of 30 m. This elevation was subtracted from a kriged surface of groundwater elevation in 2005 between observation wells [ Hausberger et al , 1998] to obtain the observed changes in saturated thickness presented using contour intervals of 5 m. The Universal Kriging algorithm in ArcGIS was used to spatially average the saturated thickness over the study region, and the values used for H 0 and the slope of the aquifer base are delineated in Table 1. Other important hydrogeologic variables in this table include hydraulic conductivity, k , and specific yield, S y , from Cederstrand and Becker [1998c, 1998b], and α is computed using = H 0 .…”
Section: Application and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%