Digital markets, competition regimes and models of capitalism: A comparative institutional analysis of European and US responses to Google

Abstract

The comparative capitalism literature examined how institutions vary on a national or societal level and how these differences affect multinational companies’ strategies. Yet, little attention has been devoted to cross-national or regional differences in the governance of competition, especially in the context of digitalization of markets. The article seeks to fill this gap by looking at the case of Google. It traces the process of the stark US–EU disagreement over Google’s abuse of dominant position in digital markets, which resulted in one of the largest fines in the EU history. It is argued that the variation in the response to the company’s market and nonmarket strategies are traced back to differences between Ordoliberal and Chicago School ideas, which are embedded in the ‘competition regimes’ of European and US capitalist models. The article concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for varieties of capitalism frameworks.

State roles in platform governance: AI’s regulatory geographies

“…Put differently, what is of interest here is how regulatory frameworks influence distributional outcomes and inequalities brought into being by the operations of Big Tech platforms. The analysis of the EU's proposed AI Act as a case study fits neatly into this context, as it directly responds to Horner and Alford's (2019) call for more research on the ramifications of digital policy frameworks (Kornelakis and Hublart, 2022). Before proceeding, however, the relationship between producer and buyer roles needs to be addressed.…”

Producing and using artificial intelligence: What can Europe learn from Siemens’s experience?

“…In fact, according to Fefer (2021, p. 10), the EU policies aimed at regulating data and cloud services seek to ‘provide a trusted data sharing alternative to using “Big Tech” platforms’. More broadly, the European Commission concerns regarding big tech companies’ effects on competition and tax avoidance stand out (European Commission, 2016, 2017; Garcia Herrero, 2019; Kornelakis and Hublart, 2021).…”

Factors affecting the adoption of metaverse in healthcare: The moderating role of digital division, and meta-culture

“…Modern digital technology has changed society in many ways [ 1 ]. Its extended applications in almost every walk of life compelled humans to integrate and converge it further to draw more benefits and to increase its usage in different fields and for different purposes [ 2 ]. Scientists have curiously worked to develop artificial intelligence technology and integrate it with the human mind [ 3 ].…”