2021
DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2021.2004092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital/material housing financialisation and activism in post-crash Dublin

Abstract: This paper's main argument is that housing financialisation can be understood as a set of intertwined digital/material processes, and that resisting housing financialisation requires activism that recognises and capitalises on this dynamic. Drawing from Desiree Fields' (2017a) work on urban struggles with financialisation, this conceptual argument is unpacked through a case study of post-crash Dublin, an urban space reshaped by housing financialisation and struggles resisting it. Housing has been a key subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O'Callaghan succinctly summarises that to address the challenge of vacancy would require ‘moving beyond technocratic fixes and opens up more fundamental questions about how we value urban space, prioritise particular forms of development, and balance the rights and responsibilities of property as absolute right to exclude against the common good’ (O'Callaghan, 2021, n.p.). Dublin has been described as ‘an urban space reshaped by housing financialisation and struggles resisting it’ (Nic Lochlainn, 2021, p. 1). To fully understand the story of Dublin, discussions need to not only focus on the processes of urban planning and financialisation at work in the city, but the outcomes of this on the people living, working, acting, playing, embodying, experiencing and spending time in Dublin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Callaghan succinctly summarises that to address the challenge of vacancy would require ‘moving beyond technocratic fixes and opens up more fundamental questions about how we value urban space, prioritise particular forms of development, and balance the rights and responsibilities of property as absolute right to exclude against the common good’ (O'Callaghan, 2021, n.p.). Dublin has been described as ‘an urban space reshaped by housing financialisation and struggles resisting it’ (Nic Lochlainn, 2021, p. 1). To fully understand the story of Dublin, discussions need to not only focus on the processes of urban planning and financialisation at work in the city, but the outcomes of this on the people living, working, acting, playing, embodying, experiencing and spending time in Dublin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons families are not favouring BTR buildings is the higher price of rent for living in a central locality, which families do not value as much [43]. However, there are factors that can change the main tenant market, such as market demand, the location of developments, and investor interests [10,12,55]. A recent example of a market change was seen in the UK, where, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the BTR-target market shifted towards key workers.…”
Section: Tenant-oriented Btr Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also an increasing amount of literature devoted to the response to the housing crisis among millennials (or young people in general) in some Western countries (especially Ireland, Germany, Spain or Sweden). Millennials are usually described there as active and sometimes radical in the ways in which they seek to raise awareness of the housing crisis and in the ways in which they seek to change the neoliberal housing policies in their countries (Lima, 2021 ; Lochlain, 2021 ; Waldron, 2022 ; Hoolachan & McKee, 2019 ; Listerborn et al, 2020 ; García-Lamarca, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%