2021
DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Modelling in Museum and Private Collections: A Case Study on Early Italic Armour

Abstract: Public, and particularly museum-based, collections provide invaluable opportunities for analysis. The objects in these collections typically offer relatively complete examples which often become reference points for newly excavated material or analyses. However, aside from issues of provenance and occasionally authenticity, one of the biggest challenges with the analysis of objects in museum collections is, perhaps ironically, their public and collection-based context. Objects on display are often only directl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D models were constructed using Agisoft Metashape 1.8.3 with a method adapted from Emmitt, Mackrell and Armstrong (2021). For each coin, the photos were imported and subsequently aligned with the quality at 'high' and the tie points were then edited.…”
Section: Photogrammetry Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 3D models were constructed using Agisoft Metashape 1.8.3 with a method adapted from Emmitt, Mackrell and Armstrong (2021). For each coin, the photos were imported and subsequently aligned with the quality at 'high' and the tie points were then edited.…”
Section: Photogrammetry Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenging and varied shape of the coins, as well as issues surrounding reflectance, required a similar but ultimately unique methodology compared to those undertaken by the team on other artefact types in past studies on 3D modelling (Emmitt, Mackrell and Armstrong 2021;. Coins pose several optical challenges compared to other artefacts.…”
Section: Challenges and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, projects make use of a mix of scanning technologies, depending on the object being scanned, and the intended use of the digital model. Textures obtained from photogrammetry could also be laid over more detailed point clouds obtained through LiDAR scanning [17].…”
Section: Background a 3d Scanning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique utilizes multiple photographs around a common object or feature to create a 3D point cloud, which can consist of thousands or hundreds of millions of points [24]. Both objects [1,4] and features [25,26] are frequently digitized in this way, and photogrammetry is applied to excavations as well as wider built and natural landscape contexts [27][28][29][30]. These data are most commonly employed as aids for interpretation or for visualization as 2.5D objects, which is an otherwise 2D dataset that is represented as a 3D model, although some work has been done on making 3D volumes from the data (e.g., [31]).…”
Section: D Data Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional recording in archaeology is an increasingly applied and accessible methodology. The reduction in costs of specialized equipment and computing power, in addition to simplified workflows, has meant that such recording methods can be applied in a wide range of contexts (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5]). Volumetric calculations are one of the goals of 3D recording, the ability to digitally define the volume that is being investigated, whether it be a sedimentary deposit or an architectural wall [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%