2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital movie piracy: A perspective on downloading behavior through social cognitive theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context at hand, one's intention to pirate could also be influenced by the formation of repeated, habitual behavior within the notion of deficient self-regulation (i.e., the extent to which a behavior is outside an individual's conscious control). Both LaRose and Kim (2007) and Jacobs et al (2012) observed a positive relationship between deficient self-regulation (which includes items relating to the degree to which habitual patterns exist) and pirating intentions and behavior.…”
Section: Habitual Patterns In Digital Piracymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the context at hand, one's intention to pirate could also be influenced by the formation of repeated, habitual behavior within the notion of deficient self-regulation (i.e., the extent to which a behavior is outside an individual's conscious control). Both LaRose and Kim (2007) and Jacobs et al (2012) observed a positive relationship between deficient self-regulation (which includes items relating to the degree to which habitual patterns exist) and pirating intentions and behavior.…”
Section: Habitual Patterns In Digital Piracymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, Freestone and Mitchell (2004) observed that Generation Y consumers seemed more accepting of digital piracy, precisely because of their belief that they were not inflicting direct harm on sellers; they also claimed to be themselves victims of prices that were maintained at an artificially high level. Regardless, the premise that downloaders consider piracy a harmless activity is well established in the literature (Levin et al 2004(Levin et al , 2007Jambon and Smetana 2012;Lysonski and Durvasula 2008;Hinduja and Higgins 2011;Nunes et al 2004;Chaudhry et al 2011;Jacobs et al 2012). Perceived harm is not included as a segmentation variable because of the possible confounding relationships between perceived harm and ethical evaluation (Fullerton et al 1996) and between perceived harm and attitude (Freestone and Mitchell 2004).…”
Section: Perceived Harmmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the recent years, the social-cognitive approach is adopted and tested against the Internet in a European context (Peters et al, 2006), mobile technology (Peters, 2007), music downloading (LaRose & Kim, 2007), video game usage, (Lee & LaRose, 2007) ambient technology (Ben Allouch, 2008) and digital movie piracy (Jacobs et al, 2012). …”
Section: Social-cognitive Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have addressed digital piracy using social cognitive theory 42,45 . Others have relied on the theory of reasoned action and planned behavior and showed that all three core components of the modelattitudes, perceived behavioral control, and social norms -are relevant and provide a basis to explore a wide range of specific motivating factors related to digital piracy 10,32,46,47,48,49,50 .…”
Section: Psychological and Social Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%