Purpose:
The aim of this study was to evaluate YouTube videos as a source of information for digital indirect bonding techniques.
Materials and methods:
The keyword “digital indirect bonding” was first searched on YouTube, resulting
in 57 recorded videos. Descriptive parameters, including source, target audience,
purpose, duration, upload date, number of likes, dislikes, views, and comments,
were then evaluated. After this initial assessment, the interaction index and viewing
rate were calculated. Video content quality was determined using a 5-point scale
that categorized videos as having poor, moderate, or good content quality. This
rating was based on the presence and discussion of various topics related to
digital indirect bonding, including digital scan, digital bracket placement, transfer
tray production from a 3D-printed model or direct production as a 3D-printed
tray, clinical application, and advantages and/or disadvantages. The videos were
assessed for quality using the global quality scale (GQS) and video information
and quality index (VIQI). Statistical evaluation was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis,
Chi-square, and Pearson correlation analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients
were calculated to determine the rating reliability.
Results:
The majority of the videos were classified as having poor content quality (41.9%),
followed by moderate (38.7%) and good (19.4%) content quality. No significant
differences were found between the videos in terms of descriptive parameters.
However, videos with good content quality had significantly higher GQS and VIQI
scores than moderate and poor content videos. The total content showed significant
correlations with GQS and VIQI (r=0.780 and r=0.446, respectively; plt;0.05).
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the majority of YouTube videos regarding digital indirect
bonding were of poor content quality, those that were of good content quality
could be considered a useful source of professional information.