2012
DOI: 10.1097/nen.0b013e3182768de4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Pathology and Image Analysis for Robust High-Throughput Quantitative Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes

Abstract: Quantitative neuropathologic methods provide information that is important for both research and clinical applications. The technological advancement of digital pathology and image analysis offers new solutions to enable valid quantification of pathological severity that is reproducible between raters regardless of experience. Using an Aperio ScanScope XT and its accompanying image analysis software, we designed algorithms for quantitation of amyloid and tau pathologies on 65 β-amyloid (6F/3D antibody) and 48 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the dynamic range of IHC is small, prohibiting a true analytic measurement of protein concentration from tissue (Rimm 2006). Further, analysis of cortical tissue, as compared with specific brain nuclei, is challenging due to the variable volume and orientation of cortical tissue in a given section (Neltner et al 2012). The vertical transection sampling method presented here identifies "representative cortex" to evaluate disease burden through random sampling to minimize sampling bias (Armstrong 2003), similar to methods used in manual quantification studies of neocortical FTLD neuropathology (Armstrong et al 1999a;Armstrong and Cairns 2012); but this approach does not replicate stereology (i.e., estimating 3-dimensional volume and cell/inclusion density from 2-dimensional images) (West et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the dynamic range of IHC is small, prohibiting a true analytic measurement of protein concentration from tissue (Rimm 2006). Further, analysis of cortical tissue, as compared with specific brain nuclei, is challenging due to the variable volume and orientation of cortical tissue in a given section (Neltner et al 2012). The vertical transection sampling method presented here identifies "representative cortex" to evaluate disease burden through random sampling to minimize sampling bias (Armstrong 2003), similar to methods used in manual quantification studies of neocortical FTLD neuropathology (Armstrong et al 1999a;Armstrong and Cairns 2012); but this approach does not replicate stereology (i.e., estimating 3-dimensional volume and cell/inclusion density from 2-dimensional images) (West et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this size because it maximized the number of tiles for random sampling (i.e. majority of tissue samples had >50 tiles) and the upper limit of inclusion counts per tile to prevent manual count fatigue (Neltner et al 2012). To determine the optimum number of random tiles to sample in our random sampling scheme, we performed a permutation analysis (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Sampling Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations