2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-022-10269-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Self-Defence: Why you Ought to Preserve Your Privacy for the Sake of Wrongdoers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on existing work, we offer two complementary proposals. First, according to interest-based views, persons have claims to not be exposed to moral risk because committing serious wrongs is bad for the wrongdoer (Brownlee 2019;Munch 2022;Tadros 2016b;. To clarify, the claim here is not that acting wrongly is bad for a person insofar as it causes other bads, such as feelings of distress and guilt, or punishment and social sanction.…”
Section: The Wrong Of Moral Risk Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on existing work, we offer two complementary proposals. First, according to interest-based views, persons have claims to not be exposed to moral risk because committing serious wrongs is bad for the wrongdoer (Brownlee 2019;Munch 2022;Tadros 2016b;. To clarify, the claim here is not that acting wrongly is bad for a person insofar as it causes other bads, such as feelings of distress and guilt, or punishment and social sanction.…”
Section: The Wrong Of Moral Risk Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%