Digital signature based key management protocol for secure data transfer in dynamic wireless sensor networks

Shruthi, G J; Hemavathi,

doi:10.1109/rteict.2016.7807871

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rank Points Quality Evaluation MES V-II [9] 2 1.5 Decent DSKM [10] 0 0 Low CBC-RC5 [11] 2 1.5 Decent HCCTPWLCM [12] 2 1.5 Decent ECCGASONeC [3] 3 2 Outstanding QTL [13] 2 1.5 Decent UES-IV [14] 2 1.5 Decent LiCi 2 1.5 Decent LCSA [15] 2 1.5 Decent ESDCBE [16] 2 1.5 Decent Multiplexing AES [17] 2 1.5 Decent AES-QPSK [18] 2 1.5 Decent ECC-DA [19] 2 1.5 Decent EEM [20] 2 1.5 Decent LPRGA [21] 2 1.5 Decent LED [22] 2 1.5 Decent SECM [23] 3 2 Outstanding DCA-SNC [24] 2 1.5 Decent ECC-KM [25] 1 1 Average ECB [26] 2 1.5 Decent MR_XOR [27] 2 1.5 Decent CP-ABE [28] 2 1.5 Decent ECC-AES [29] 2 1.5 Decent MutationAES [30] 2 1.5 Decent RSA approach [31] 2 1.5 Decent MRSA [27] 2 1.…”

Section: Research Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Literature Review of Security Schemes for Data Exchange in Wireless Sensor Network

Ali,

Ashraf,

Ullah

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Research Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Literature Review of Security Schemes for Data Exchange in Wireless Sensor Network

Ali,

Ashraf,

Ullah

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…60 This study presents digital signature based on key management (DK) for data security. 61 Asymmetric method doubles the computation time. [62][63][64] Research in Gracy and Venkatesan 65 uses honey encryption (HoneyE) procedure to create misperception.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Side-channel attack can occur 60 D K 61 -Vulnerable to related-key attacks 73 RC5-CBC 74 -Differential attack and linear attack occur because of the usage of RC5, 75 also used PRNG, which makes it vulnerable to direct cryptanalytic attack, input-based attack, backtracking attack and many more 38 HTPW 39 -Chosen-plaintext attack can occur on this because of XOR operation used. Also suffer from known-plaintext attack 13 EGASON 3 Passive attack, key-space analysis attack, compromised CH attack, Sinkhole attack, HELLO flood attack, and DOS attacks cannot occur Vulnerable to brute-force attack.…”

Section: Serial Nomentioning

confidence: 99%

An efficient cryptographic technique using modified Diffie–Hellman in wireless sensor networks

Ali

Humaria

Ramzan

et al. 2020

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In wireless sensor networks, the sensors transfer data through radio signals to a remote base station. Sensor nodes are used to sense environmental conditions such as temperature, strain, humidity, sound, vibration, and position. Data security is a major issue in wireless sensor networks since data travel over the naturally exposed wireless channel where malicious attackers may get access to critical information. The sensors in wireless sensor networks are resource-constrained devices whereas the existing data security approaches have complex security mechanisms with high computational and response times affecting the network lifetime. Furthermore, existing systems, such as secure efficient encryption algorithm, use the Diffie–Hellman approach for key generation and exchange; however, Diffie–Hellman is highly vulnerable to the man-in-the-middle attack. This article introduces a data security approach with less computational and response times based on a modified version of Diffie–Hellman. The Diffie–Hellman has been modified to secure it against attacks by generating a hash of each value that is transmitted over the network. The proposed approach has been analyzed for security against various attacks. Furthermore, it has also been analyzed in terms of encryption/decryption time, computation time, and key generation time for different sizes of data. The comparative analysis with the existing approaches shows that the proposed approach performs better in most of the cases.

show abstract

“…Shruthi G J and Hemavathi [3] proposed Digital signature based key management protocol for secure data transfer in dynamic WSNs and key size also increased upto 1024 bit.It explains identification of authorized users, original content of document and it also verifies packets. Authors done implementation using network simulator -2 (NS-2).…”

Section: E Digital Signature Based Key Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In general use of sensor network, key management includes two essential aspects: One is establishing pairwise keys, which can be used to protect data delivered between sensors; another is distributing cluster key, which can be used to realize secure data fusion in a cluster.In this paper our focus is more on the security issues of dynamic WSN and our study shed lights on latest developments in dynamic key management in dynamic WSN. There are various types of key management systems proposed in the past such as Secret-sharing-based Key Management[2] ,Digital Signature Based Key Management Protocol [3] ,Certificateless Effective Key Management [4] etc. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Improved CL-EKM based Key Management System

Patil¹,

Bhosale²

2017

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Comm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In not distant future, the Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) is widely used in many applications like military and civil domains. The wireless sensor networks are always deployed in hostile and pervasive environment. Security is major worry in wireless sensor network. The traditional network security methods are not suitable for wireless sensor networks because of limited resource. Several Key management and establishment schemes have been suggested to provide light weight ciphers. The key management schemes play an important role in wireless sensor networks toachieve security. Basically, key management includes two aspects: key distribution and key revocation. Key distribution refers to the task of distributing secret keys between communicating parties to provide secrecy and authentication. Key revocation directs to the task of securely removing compromised keys. By revoking all of the keys of a compromised sensor node, node can be removed from the network. As compared to key distribution, key revocation has received very little attention. In this paper a survey of key management schemes in wireless sensor networks has been executed.

show abstract

Digital signature based key management protocol for secure data transfer in dynamic wireless sensor networks

Cited by 6 publications

References 3 publications

Systematic Literature Review of Security Schemes for Data Exchange in Wireless Sensor Network

Systematic Literature Review of Security Schemes for Data Exchange in Wireless Sensor Network

An efficient cryptographic technique using modified Diffie–Hellman in wireless sensor networks

An Improved CL-EKM based Key Management System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About