2006
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200521962
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital soil mapping in Germany—a review

Abstract: Digital soil mapping as a tool to generate spatial soil information provides solutions for the growing demand for high‐resolution soil maps worldwide. Even in highly developed countries like Germany, digital soil mapping becomes essential due to the decreasing, time‐consuming, and expensive field surveys which are no longer affordable by the soil surveys of the individual federal states.This article summarizes the present state of soil survey in Germany in terms of digitally available soil data, applied digita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though this functional relationship was not expressed numerically; the theoretical considerations of Jenny (1941) are the basis of today's process-oriented modeling in soil sciences. Digital soil mapping (see Lagacherie, et al 2007, McBratney et al, 2003, Behrens & Scholten, 2006 developed mostly statistical and geostatistical models to indirectly predict specific physical or chemical properties of soils incorporating specific spatial uncertainties. However, the majority of 15 these approaches are not process based, therefore being capable for site-specific soil property data regionalization but do not contribute to the understanding of the factor correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though this functional relationship was not expressed numerically; the theoretical considerations of Jenny (1941) are the basis of today's process-oriented modeling in soil sciences. Digital soil mapping (see Lagacherie, et al 2007, McBratney et al, 2003, Behrens & Scholten, 2006 developed mostly statistical and geostatistical models to indirectly predict specific physical or chemical properties of soils incorporating specific spatial uncertainties. However, the majority of 15 these approaches are not process based, therefore being capable for site-specific soil property data regionalization but do not contribute to the understanding of the factor correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, spatially distributed quantification of soil properties is difficult because of the complexity and dynamic nature of the soil system itself (Hillel, 1982). The necessity for quantified and spatially distributed soil functional properties is clear (Behrens and Scholten, 2006;McBratney et al, 2003). Moreover, explicit soil representation in models of environmental processes and systems (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not directly provide the functional soil properties required by environmental models. Several techniques have been introduced to tackle this lack of functional description such as pedotransfer functions, geostatistical approaches, and state-factor (Clorpt) approaches (Behrens and Scholten, 2006). Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) have been developed to predict functional soil properties using easily measurable soil properties such as particle size grading, organic content, and clay content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New generations of scientists are also attracted to the spatial analysis of soils (Behrens & Scholten, 2006;Hartemink et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%